{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12MQ003","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B cleanly moves routine activation to the evidence-readiness holder while retaining audit independence and a fallback. A is testable but an elaborate mechanical recorder whose marginal evidentiary practicality is weak."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ047","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A aligns diagnostic landmarks, replacement units, interfaces, and reintegration checks with coherent physical spans. B is similarly rigorous but its proposed electrical cuts are more vulnerable to shared-reference and fixture-induced artifacts."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ018","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"B","reason":"Both accurately target private information and strategic certification. B more fully specifies the truthful-routing condition, known-omission verification, fairness constraints, and a controlled comparative evidence step."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ024","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"A gives a particularly credible bounded authority structure for urgent, ecosystem-binding registry actions, including time limits, representation, competence, and outcome-changing review. B is strong but depends more heavily on a contested translation of consent and representation into per-service automation."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ036","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B presents a direct pulse-load mechanism, controlled mediator measurements, and clear rival explanations. A is strong but its staged cure controller and capsule-release assumptions introduce additional coupled kinetic and completion risks."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ032","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B partitions genuinely differently exhausting treatment functions and tests both local substitution and whole-train coherence against strong rivals. A is well specified but may create stack-interface effects that overwhelm the local-change benefit."}]}