{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12MQ029","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":4,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"A more cleanly separates opening dispersion, response-gated staging, and slow-ramp alternatives, with stronger mediator measurements and falsifiers. Its capsule design is somewhat more elaborate."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ016","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"A targets a clearly bounded, measurable technical choke while preserving audit provenance and authority. B is thoughtful but its client-capacity tokens and effort estimates introduce greater independence and operational fragility."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ001","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"A is a direct, naturally deployable instance of recovery-herd control, with correct authorization-scoped coalescing and a strong trace replay. B is coherent but less central to the supplied software-engineering context."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ031","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":4,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"B","reason":"B retains the essential lattice-templating, independent-reference, separation, and seed-free persistence test with fewer decorative analogues and a more plausible bounded experiment. A's microaperture and mechanical-severance apparatus is unnecessarily elaborate."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ010","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"B","reason":"B identifies a sharper cutoff-evidence mismatch and tests whether transfer-triggered measurement distinguishes offsetting sequences that snapshots cannot. It explicitly bounds its evidentiary claim and recognizes functional-equivalence collapse."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ011","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly inverts initiation to the component holding otherwise unavailable workflow-safety context, while retaining platform policy, deadline, and capacity authority. Its shadow test directly compares the causal prediction against centralized signals."}]}