{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12MQ035","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":4,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A gives the transfer gate a genuinely bounded authority role with explicit fail-closed evidence paths. B's selective repair chemistry is plausible but its authority/consent mapping is more metaphorical."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ050","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"Both localize activation at the context holder, but crack-triggered capsule release has a more direct, practical causal route and bounded feasibility test."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ014","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A explicitly redesigns disclosure, verification, and consequences around preparers' private knowledge. B physically removes one duplicate-presentation payoff but is a narrow counting device rather than a full incentive-compatible rule."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ044","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":4,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A offers a more practically grounded and testable molecular-partitioning hypothesis. B has a stronger formal self-penalty analogy, but its transport bypass, fatigue, and surrogate-to-lithium gaps make the causal proposal less plausible."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ004","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B cleanly partitions independently exhausting treatment functions, specifies interfaces and reintegration, and directly tests whether substitution remains localized. A is strong but faces substantial shared-melt coupling that may defeat its proposed module boundaries."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ045","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"Both provide credible self-selection, verification, and proportional consequences. B more directly targets a materials-development gate and aligns qualification with the stated reproducibility outcome rather than a selected maximum."}]}