{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp12_substrate_denial72_20260805","cell_id":"authority_legitimacy_and_consent_foundations__accounting_auditing","arm":"CONSTRAINED_MAX","candidate_id":"authority_legitimacy_and_consent_foundations__accounting_auditing__CONSTRAINED_MAX","decision":"ABSTAIN","abstention_reason":"The archetype’s essential causal pathway is irreducibly institutional: auditing authority becomes acceptable and binding through mandate, affected-party consent or representation, reason-giving, procedural fairness, and accountable review. A physical accounting instrument could improve measurement provenance or prevent double counting, but after removing authorization, governance, reporting, and procedural enforcement it could not establish scoped consent or legitimate decision authority. Relabeling calibration, tamper evidence, or mechanical interlocks as mandate, consent, and accountability would be a vocabulary-only mapping rather than preservation of the archetype’s causal structure.","proposal":null}