{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp12_substrate_denial72_20260805","cell_id":"authority_mentor_relationship_anchoring__accounting_auditing","arm":"CONSTRAINED_HIGH","candidate_id":"authority_mentor_relationship_anchoring__accounting_auditing__CONSTRAINED_HIGH","decision":"ABSTAIN","abstention_reason":"The archetype’s essential causal effect is relational enculturation: a legitimate human mentor transmits tacit accounting or auditing judgment through observation, dialogue, corrective feedback, and progressively released autonomy. Removing authorization, procedure, reporting, incentives, and other governance or informational channels eliminates that effect. A physical ledger, reference specimen, instrument, or spatially shared workstation could support the relationship, but its material operation alone would neither transmit professional norms nor preserve the mentor-authority, dialogic-interpretation, and autonomy-release mechanisms. Treating a calibration standard or physical audit artifact as the 'mentor' would be only a vocabulary-level analogy and would not preserve the supplied causal structure. Therefore no causally defensible candidate satisfies the binding substrate counterfactual.","proposal":null}