{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp12_substrate_denial72_20260805","cell_id":"incentive_compatible_rule_design__computer_science","arm":"CONSTRAINED_HIGH","candidate_id":"incentive_compatible_rule_design__computer_science__CONSTRAINED_HIGH","decision":"ABSTAIN","abstention_reason":"The archetype’s essential causal effect is produced by changing strategic participants’ rules, payoffs, information, verification, or consequences so a desired action becomes their best response. Those are forbidden governance, incentive, authorization, or procedural channels. A passive hardware, material, mechanical, energetic, or measurement intervention could constrain or reveal computer-system behavior, but after removing software, reporting, incentives, authorization, and enforcement it would not change a strategic participant’s payoff-ranked choices; treating components as self-interested participants would be metaphorical and would violate the required causal mapping. Therefore no causally defensible candidate satisfies the counterfactual substrate constraint.","proposal":null}