{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q065","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B cleanly gives the readiness-context holder a bounded activation right while retaining audit independence. A produces narrow extraction evidence but its mechanical callback analogy is forced and does not address key disbursement assertions."},{"pair_id":"E12Q024","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":2,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly establishes a scoped counting measure and disjoint recomposition for the selector’s actual coverage problem. B specifies useful calibration tests, but thermal isolation and complete physical attribution in an operating node are unlikely to support its claimed additive domains."},{"pair_id":"E12Q048","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A preserves the full local-signal, aggregation, uncertain classification, response, and feedback structure with realistic corroboration. B has a strong bounded test, but the embedded guards may materially create or redirect the dendrite topology they purport to detect."},{"pair_id":"E12Q064","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"A is a direct, bounded inversion from scheduler push to consumer demand with explicit validity and fallback rules. B is a plausible local pull mechanism, but hydraulic interactions and actuator lag make its claimed allocation benefit less causally secure."},{"pair_id":"E12Q003","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B genuinely separates vocabulary, premises, transition rules, derivation traces, and interpretation boundaries for cumulative process compatibility. A is a useful physical reaction-array experiment, but its channel topology only metaphorically instantiates formal derivation."},{"pair_id":"E12Q066","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A partitions genuinely distinct consolidation responsibilities with explicit handoffs, ownership, and whole-package invariants. B creates physical subunits and local readings, but added cassettes, tares, and transfer interfaces can create measurement and handling burdens beyond the stated localization gain."}]}