{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q011","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly governs consequential formulation tradeoffs, thresholds, authorization, sensitivity, and revision. B makes weights visible but substitutes an elaborate physical comparator for the archetype’s legitimacy and governance process."},{"pair_id":"E12Q055","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A cleanly exploits an existing workload gradient through a bounded, monitored channel with credible decoupling. B fits the physical archetype but its likely energy yield and added thermal burden make the proposed hold-up path much less plausible."},{"pair_id":"E12Q043","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":2,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly establishes scoped, competent, reviewable authority for contested audit findings. A is a useful custody and sampling-control device, but physical concurrence cannot supply the mandate, representation, or legitimacy foundation it claims to instantiate."},{"pair_id":"E12Q018","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A preserves the local-to-macro interaction structure, contextual interpretation, classification, response, and feedback required for emergence detection. B is a credible physical shrinkage check, but primarily aggregates flows and detects variance rather than detecting an emergent interaction pattern."},{"pair_id":"E12Q069","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly stages CI evidence by diagnostic state, preserves source-linked drilldown, and surfaces critical exceptions. A is a coherent physical analogue but added fixture complexity and signal disturbance weaken its practical advantage over ordinary test access."},{"pair_id":"E12Q026","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B is a direct, bounded formal derivation system with explicit grammar, axioms, facts, rules, certificates, closure limits, and versioning. A faithfully embodies the structure physically, but its mechanical proof chain is disproportionately cumbersome for the narrow, fallible interface classification it can represent."}]}