{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q054","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":2,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly implements persistent formulation-specific calibration maps with explicit routing, isolation, and re-entry tests on a shared instrument. B maps the structure carefully, but reciprocal photo-switched enantioselective imprint geometries are a highly speculative material mechanism."},{"pair_id":"E12Q035","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B explicitly couples goal, causal hypotheses, bounded actions, authority, execution feedback, learning, escalation, and proportional accountability. A is a credible passive thermal regulator, but its goal representation and selection policy are embodied analogies rather than a full agentic control loop."},{"pair_id":"E12Q013","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"A fixes a finite domain and exhaustively enumerates its preimage, explicitly preserving multiplicity, boundaries, and downstream limits. B handles unknown regions responsibly, but a sparse microbatch study plus backsolve cannot strongly characterize a high-dimensional continuous preimage."},{"pair_id":"E12Q023","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":1,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B addresses a genuine binding-authority problem through a bounded mandate, representation, competence, reasons, conflict controls, and consequential appeal. A is a technical localization hypothesis that decoratively recasts reaction selectivity as consent and authority."},{"pair_id":"E12Q067","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":1,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A is a transparent, identity-neutral self-selection menu with enforceable service differences, a base-quality floor, and explicit fairness checks. B is a plausible staged thermal-buffer hypothesis, but heat-pulse threshold activation has no meaningful buyer valuation, price, or offer-menu structure."},{"pair_id":"E12Q056","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"A uses condition-rich endpoint criteria, reverse dependencies, present commitments, and explicit pathway-versus-endpoint revision discipline. B credibly uses reverse material-balance design, but it is narrower inverse process formulation and has more uncertain coupled transport and phase assumptions."}]}