{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q025","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"TIE","reason":"Both tightly instantiate synchronized release dispersion in latent-hardener cure, retain stoichiometry, specify falsifiers, and offer bounded calorimetric evidence. A is more self-contained; B adds capacity feedback but also sensor/control dependence."},{"pair_id":"E12Q062","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A preserves the priming-decay lifecycle, measured proxy, threshold, refresh, and non-reliance rule. B is a credible repair hypothesis, but equating thermal mobility decay with cognitive priming requires a more forced archetype transfer."},{"pair_id":"E12Q030","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"Both maintain persistent keyed maps with isolation and re-entry checks. A more directly addresses recurring semantic version skew on a genuinely shared substrate, with provenance-based abstention and reproducible historical re-entry."},{"pair_id":"E12Q034","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly uses reverse-derived prerequisite conditions to produce present, reversible provenance commitments and tests the dependency path. A is well specified but translates planning milestones into circuit stages more decoratively."},{"pair_id":"E12Q022","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":2,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A explicitly models private readiness information, self-selection, bounded consequences, verification, appeal, and distributional risks. B presents a plausible compatibilizer hypothesis but recasts molecular partitioning as strategic incentive design too metaphorically."},{"pair_id":"E12Q053","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly characterizes the bounded preimage of a reconciliation residual while separating compatibility from proof. B adds informative physical constraints, but a sampler at every boundary is materially intrusive and less plausible as the bounded audit next step."}]}