{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q021","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly characterizes a frozen, finite many-to-one software mapping with exhaustive coverage. A is disciplined but its low-voltage short predicate is only an imperfect proxy for the historical protection trip."},{"pair_id":"E12Q014","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"A makes the decomposition physically consequential: non-target geometry and preload are retained through a local exchange and directly measured. B is strong, but cross-layer chemistry may defeat the proposed local autonomy more fundamentally."},{"pair_id":"E12Q032","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A fully implements accountable weighting governance in a consequential audit-prioritization setting. B embodies weights visibly but substitutes an elaborate classifier for the archetype’s core legitimacy and revision process."},{"pair_id":"E12Q058","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B naturally applies propagation, justified partitioning, and recomposition to the coupled accounting equations that create the problem. A is coherent but its temporary physical rig is operationally burdensome for the claimed audit use."},{"pair_id":"E12Q045","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":4},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B is a direct, bounded pruning procedure with explicit hard exclusions, diversity retention, audit sampling, and reentry. A’s pruning validity depends on a fragile location-to-surface-heat mapping."},{"pair_id":"E12Q010","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"A cleanly separates feasibility guardrails, dominance filtering, and the authorized value choice among audit-evidence bundles. B is a credible physical frontier experiment, but its limited plate set and provisional knee rule provide a narrower decision basis."}]}