{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q016","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly stages audit-review information while preserving exception visibility, evidence lineage, orientation, and full access. A has a coherent physical summary-to-detail analogue, but its mass-localization structure is a less natural fit for user-facing disclosure and has narrower audit applicability."},{"pair_id":"E12Q052","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A cleanly defines causal candidate branches, hard exclusions, uncertainty retention, exclusion audit, and reentry in a real reconciliation investigation. B is a credible screening fixture, but its physical bounds provide limited audit assurance and the destructive-count framing and apparatus add substantial operational burden."},{"pair_id":"E12Q037","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly establishes a measurable universe, disjoint terminal partition, nonnegative inventory, boundary policy, and recomposition test for a consequential chemistry measurement problem. B realizes additivity physically, but altering a functional carrier into separable tiles risks measuring a seam-induced artifact rather than the intended monolithic coating system."},{"pair_id":"E12Q042","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A explicitly connects distributed local retry behavior to aggregation, uncertainty-aware macro-pattern classification, human-owned response, and feedback review. B records spatial heat exposure well, but a connected witness pattern is weaker evidence of an emergent airflow interaction and can be confounded by the measurement panel and non-airflow heat sources."},{"pair_id":"E12Q047","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"A more directly couples an already present thermal gradient to a specified useful cure channel, with bounded operation, sinks, monitoring, and deliberate decoupling. B is well controlled experimentally, but delayed latent-heat release may not align with remaining cure demand and can be indistinguishable from dilution or altered conductivity."},{"pair_id":"E12Q038","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":2,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A addresses the archetype itself: contestable CI tradeoffs are made explicit, constrained, impact-traced, sensitivity-tested, authorized, and revisable. B implements weighted physical control with a safety override, but hardware-adjustable force biases do not supply the legitimacy, stakeholder review, or accountable revision process central to weighting governance."}]}