{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q050","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A preserves feasibility, dominance screening, explicit preference selection, and recheck triggers in a realistic CI decision. B encodes a narrow, potentially unstable two-objective hardware tradeoff into custom mechanics, making the frontier representation expensive and fragile."},{"pair_id":"E12Q061","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly resets a prior-year audit-planning anchor with a protected independent estimate, evidence comparison, and dependency trace. A supplies strong independent physical evidence, but its representativeness depends heavily on sampling and it is closer to measurement correction than a general anchoring reset."},{"pair_id":"E12Q057","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":2,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A substantively grounds automated authority in delegated scope, competence evidence, affected-party recognition, reason-giving, expiration, and independent review. B provides useful hardware mutual exclusion, but mechanically exclusive drive power is not a credible substitute for legitimacy, consent, or accountable authority."},{"pair_id":"E12Q033","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B clearly identifies the generated parser as inherited substrate, reconstructs lineage and origin assumptions, probes the context shift, assigns controls and stewardship, and has a bounded evidence step. A has a coherent physical-channel audit but adds a bespoke analog gate where established certification approaches are more direct."},{"pair_id":"E12Q004","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly controls the ledger-final release correlation with exact-match coalescing, capacity-aware admission, fairness, and priority safeguards while preserving evidence provenance. A has a plausible physical serialization mechanism, but its custom material-handling apparatus is comparatively cumbersome and its completion signal is an imperfect proxy for reconciliation readiness."},{"pair_id":"E12Q041","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B uses an existing hydraulic gradient through a bounded measurement channel, explicitly budgets pressure loss and leakage, monitors runaway conditions, and restores equilibrium after the cut-off measurement. A thoughtfully bounds deadline-driven remediation, but translating close pressure into live control-change leverage remains less causally secure and less practical during reporting."}]}