{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q065","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":4},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B cleanly gives the context holder a bounded readiness-trigger right while preserving auditor independence. A creates extraction-coupled evidence, but it is only a partial analogue of reversed initiation and is mechanically burdensome."},{"pair_id":"E12Q043","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":2,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly addresses contested authority over audit findings through mandate, scope, reasons, competence, and review. A improves sampling control and evidentiary preservation but cannot physically instantiate the legitimacy foundations it claims."},{"pair_id":"E12Q058","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"Both follow propagation-before-partitioning and recomposition well. B applies that sequence directly to the accounting dependency network with a feasible read-only replay; A is coherent but operationally intrusive and less readily transferable from a water-loop trial."},{"pair_id":"E12Q023","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":1,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B is a bounded, credible authority-foundation intervention for shared laboratory infrastructure. A may be a chemically testable repair concept, but its authority and consent mappings are decorative rather than structurally operative."},{"pair_id":"E12Q046","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly establishes a common measurable audit universe, union-based coverage mass, partition invariance, and explicit boundary treatment. B is structurally sound but adds a specialized mechanical installation to a cutoff problem that can often be addressed more simply."},{"pair_id":"E12Q005","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B applies constraint propagation, justified decomposition, and recomposition directly to a common shared-schema migration problem with a bounded replay. A embodies the pattern vividly but relies on a highly complex mechanical encoding that is unlikely to scale or cover actual network paths."}]}