{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q064","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"A cleanly reverses analysis initiation to the consuming pass with bounded provider control. B is a credible thermal-feedback design, but its IoC framing is less direct than local feedback regulation."},{"pair_id":"E12Q001","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":1,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly implements a transparent self-selection quality-and-price menu with integrity floors. A’s threshold assay is technically articulated but maps price discrimination onto chemical extraction barriers decoratively."},{"pair_id":"E12Q017","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly measures and governs the operational lifetime of a defined review cue. B is a detailed adaptive-refresh hypothesis, but equating charge retention with cognitive priming is a strained archetype transfer and the hardware premise is difficult to establish safely."},{"pair_id":"E12Q044","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":2,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A is a genuine anchor-repair protocol with independent estimation, calibration, and inheritance tracing. B plausibly tests polymorph seed memory, but treats physical templating as cognitive anchoring rather than applying the supplied decision archetype."},{"pair_id":"E12Q063","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"Both instantiate frontier selection, but A has stronger objective comparability, guardrail governance, uncertainty treatment, and a practical read-only evidence step. B depends more heavily on uncertain density-to-identity separation."},{"pair_id":"E12Q040","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"A precisely confines material-state initiation to qualified cure transitions with clear validation and fallback. B is a plausible crack-triggered repair hypothesis, but its self-healing chemistry and baseline-material penalties remain more uncertain."}]}