{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q022","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":2,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":4,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly redesigns strategic human choices, verification, and consequences. B is a plausible materials hypothesis but translates strategic rule concepts into molecular free-energy states too decoratively."},{"pair_id":"E12Q006","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A gives a genuine truth-revealing accounting mechanism with bounded sanctions and safeguards. B supplies strong physical traceability but only indirectly changes incentives and requires a bespoke mechanical control."},{"pair_id":"E12Q068","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"Both instantiate modular decomposition well, but A more directly addresses software responsibility entanglement with credible contracts and integration invariants. B's diagnostic and service benefits must overcome added optical-interface fragility."},{"pair_id":"E12Q031","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":2,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly implements bounded, plural, autonomy-preserving mentor enculturation for tacit incident judgment. A is an elaborate physical analogy rather than a mentor relationship or cultural-transmission intervention."},{"pair_id":"E12Q004","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"Both target a genuine shared-release choke point, but B directly measures and governs the ledger-final release wave, duplicate work, capacity, provenance, and fairness. A is credible yet mechanically complex and conditional on physical overlap being the material control failure."},{"pair_id":"E12Q057","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":2,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly grounds automated rollback authority in mandate, scope, competence, reason-giving, and review. B offers a useful hardware interlock, but recasts legitimacy and consent as electrical geometry rather than addressing authority accepted by affected parties."}]}