{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q013","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":4,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"A exhaustively characterizes a declared finite input domain with direct material witnesses, explicit boundary handling, and a decisive collision test. B’s continuous, high-dimensional preimage is less credibly bounded by its small study and solver-supported regions."},{"pair_id":"E12Q007","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly propagates defect-chemical and equipment constraints, justifies any partition through an explicit interface, and uses a feasible archival falsification step. A is inventive but depends on restrictive, potentially non-monotonic capillary-reaction behavior that can make physical pruning misleading."},{"pair_id":"E12Q027","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A applies reverse dependency reasoning to an appropriate evidence-readiness endpoint while preserving accounting authority and auditor independence. B has a clear physical chain but overreaches as support for accounting cut-off and existence evidence and is impractical relative to its bounded claim."},{"pair_id":"E12Q032","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A fully governs objectives, protected thresholds, authority, sensitivity consequences, and revision. B physically instantiates a weighted classifier but does not substantively provide the legitimacy and review lifecycle central to weighting governance."},{"pair_id":"E12Q054","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A is a direct, bounded application of persistent keyed calibration maps on a shared instrument, with explicit isolation and re-entry tests. B maps the structure elegantly but relies on a highly speculative reciprocal photoresponsive imprint mechanism and difficult material realization."},{"pair_id":"E12Q016","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly stages audit-review information by decision need, preserves evidence lineage and full access, and makes mandatory exceptions visible before sign-off. A provides a useful physical localization hierarchy but its aggregate mass logic remains vulnerable to material audit-relevance limits."}]}