{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q069","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly stages CI evidence by diagnostic state with traceable drilldown and a realistic bounded comparison. A is carefully specified but the layered physical fixture adds substantial signal-integrity and handling burdens."},{"pair_id":"E12Q029","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"A fully instantiates recurring context-keyed maps, isolation, visible selection, and re-entry on a genuinely shared accounting substrate. B is coherent, but its keyed multi-cam instrument is a more forced response to a problem often solved through established calibrated instrumentation."},{"pair_id":"E12Q002","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"A makes feedstock history, context shift, audit-boundary extension, ownership, and disposition jointly operative. B is a plausible contaminant-control experiment, but its guard train primarily purifies rather than performs a lineage-risk audit."},{"pair_id":"E12Q033","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":4},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B cleanly extends review from a generated artifact through its toolchain lineage and tests the origin-context mismatch with bounded controls. A has useful cable diagnostics but relies on an unusually elaborate custom fixture and weakly recoverable historical lineage."},{"pair_id":"E12Q037","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly defines a traceable universe, admissible terminal partition, null policy, and recomposition test for recovery claims. B realizes additivity physically, but tiled construction can itself alter deposition, weakening fidelity to the original carrier."},{"pair_id":"E12Q038","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A governs consequential compensatory CI priorities through explicit authority, thresholds, sensitivity, impact traces, and revision. B is a testable passive controller, but mechanical force weighting is not equivalent to governance of contestable objective weights."}]}