{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12Q011","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":3,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"winner":"A","reason":"A directly governs objectives, thresholds, authority, sensitivity, and revision around a real formulation gate. B makes weights visible but substitutes an impractical, calibration-heavy physical comparator for the necessary legitimacy and approval process."},{"pair_id":"E12Q010","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A fully separates feasibility, dominance screening, frontier deliberation, and authorized audit judgment. B is a credible bounded physical design study, but its knee-based sampler selection is narrower and more apparatus-dependent than the archetype's general decision intervention."},{"pair_id":"E12Q049","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":3,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A is a well-bounded progressive-disclosure implementation with explicit task, risk, orientation, and full-access safeguards. B is principally a multilevel exposure indicator; its staged visual response only partially realizes user-facing information disclosure."},{"pair_id":"E12Q026","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":5},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly creates a versioned formal vocabulary, grammar, axioms, inference rules, certificates, closure limits, and regression checks for a software decision domain. A faithfully embodies a calculus but does so through a highly contrived physical interlock with limited practical scope."},{"pair_id":"E12Q053","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":1},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":2,"contrivance_risk":4},"winner":"A","reason":"A precisely fixes the reconciliation mapping, bounded domain, membership rule, multiplicity, completeness limits, and downstream evidentiary guardrail. B can constrain physical shortage configurations, but requires an intrusive and operationally burdensome witness infrastructure."},{"pair_id":"E12Q008","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":4,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":1},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly audits inherited audit-file judgments, their origin conditions, propagation, context shift, ownership, and refresh triggers. A identifies a genuine inherited material-substrate risk but is a specialized preservation apparatus with a less complete stewardship lifecycle."}]}