{"adjudications":[{"pair_id":"E13Q030","reason":"A has the stronger measurable consequence model: its physical dose–response forecast, bounded transfer uncertainty, and conservative fallback support a genuine precommitment correction rather than a contested interpretive score.","winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q008","reason":"A more clearly separates person, position, crew coupling, and equipment through direct force–motion evidence plus bounded substitutions, providing higher incremental and testable attribution value.","winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q046","reason":"B preserves a valid aggregate enforcement indicator while testing comparable micro-level discretion with case-mix controls and standardized files; A’s room-average sound level is a weaker proxy for intelligibility.","winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q029","reason":"B better supports property-specific mixed transitions with practical, athlete-controlled safeguards; A’s chamber assay is precise but has limited ecological transfer to competition altitude.","winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q043","reason":"B directly connects competing continuity claims to a reversible, provenance-preserving classification transition. A’s material evidence constrains chronology but only indirectly supports literary-form regime claims.","winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q027","reason":"B supplies a distinct, governed local-to-durable memory case with explicit harvest, validation, expiry, and reconciliation, while A closely repeats the reference-ledger architecture in P1.","winner":"B"}]}