{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Orlando Police Headquarters and Crime Lab adaptive-reuse project","overlap":"An operational evidence facility combines evidence storage, processing laboratories, training, vehicle processing, specialized narcotics and weapons storage, while reserving 27,000 square feet of unfinished shell space for future growth. This is direct evidence-domain prior art for separating present capacity from later build-out.","remaining_difference":"The case does not disclose a predecessor-geometry mock-up, an independently certifiable fire-rated core, capped and mechanically isolated expansion interfaces, fixed physical complexity limits, passive boundary witnesses, or an inert-load launch gate.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"NARA fire-compartmented archival storage modules","overlap":"NARA describes storage buildings divided into bounded modules by rated fire walls, controlled shelving and aisle geometry, protected openings, and limits on module size—close component-level art for physical containment and capacity bounding.","remaining_difference":"The guidance concerns archival fire-loss containment, not evidence chain of custody or staged launch. It does not combine capped expansion utilities, analog boundary instrumentation, predecessor constraint memory, and independent evidence-repository occupancy.","source_ids":["SRC3"]},{"name":"Full-scale modifiable patient-room mock-up practice","overlap":"A full-scale, low-cost, reversible mock-up was used to evaluate layout, storage, accessibility, workflow, user experience, and design changes with representative furniture and equipment before construction.","remaining_difference":"The practice is outside evidence storage and does not test custody integrity, environmental isolation, fire separation, fixed load budgets, tamper visibility, or independent operation of a launch cell.","source_ids":["SRC4"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The contrastive claim is falsified if representative inert-load trials show that the proposed cell cannot accommodate every legally mandatory launch evidence class and custody operation; requires shared ventilation, suppression, loading, circulation, security, or utility dependencies from deferred modules; detects overload, environmental drift, boundary disturbance, or handling conflicts no earlier than the integrated design; or cannot obtain independent code and occupancy approval.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"A regional evidence repository can open lawfully around a predecessor-geometry-derived, fire-rated custody cell—without software scope controls—when fixed rack, floor-load, air-volume, clearance, and analog boundary indicators impose a visible physical complexity budget and capped, mechanically isolated interfaces keep every deferred capability outside the launch dependency graph. The retained sources teach several ingredients separately but not this evidence-domain combination or its claimed launchability effect.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"The bounded search covered the exact intervention, property-room and older police-facility terminology, evidence-management guidance and facility practices, shell-space/phased expansion, fire-compartmented storage, and full-scale workflow mock-ups. Four opened sources from four publishers include government research and official guidance. Phrase misses were not treated as novelty evidence.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"A reversible one-aisle mock-up using inert containers and representative dummy masses is a limited, observable test. Full-scale modifiable mock-ups are established for layout, storage, accessibility, and workflow evaluation, while the proposed involvement of fire, structural, accessibility, custody, and independent reviewers addresses the principal domain-specific limits before live evidence is introduced.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"Existing sources separately show demanding evidence-storage requirements, evidence-facility shell space, fire-separated storage modules, and full-scale mock-up evaluation. None of the retained sources discloses their proposed combination or the measurable claim that physical isolation and visible capacity limits reduce launch dependencies without software or committee scope controls.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"No retained source establishes a categorical prohibition on a non-operational inert mock-up or an independently reviewed modular design. Evidence security, environmental preservation, fire separation, protected openings, accessibility, and capacity remain mandatory constraints; the proposal preserves statutory approvals, excludes live evidence, and specifies halt conditions rather than bypassing those constraints.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"The problem class is visible: NIST identifies evidence security and condition-specific storage as fundamental, IACP reports aging facilities becoming operationally inadequate, and the Orlando case shows a broad evidence/laboratory program constrained by budget and accommodated through adaptive reuse plus future shell space. The exact regional predecessor-success narrative and alleged redesign cycle are not independently demonstrated, so support is partial rather than complete.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","problem_evidence":{"finding":"Public evidence supports the general tension among secure preservation, specialized evidence classes, facility inadequacy, budget limits, and future growth. It also shows a real evidence facility combining storage, laboratories, training, vehicle processing, and specialized zones while reserving shell space. Public sources do not verify the proposal's specific regional project, its postponed-capability stockpile, or that predecessor constraints caused the claimed safe custody flow.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P012","screen_survival":true,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":"No direct result disclosed the complete combination of predecessor-geometry preservation, an independently occupiable evidence core, a hard physical complexity budget, analog boundary-state instrumentation, capped expansion interfaces, and inert-load launch testing.","queries":["evidence storage facility design phased modular expansion fire rated vault","police evidence facility \"shell space\" future expansion","evidence facility phased construction independently operable storage","property evidence room mock-up full scale design"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":"No exact match was found for the titled Core Custody Cell and Capped Expansion Spine intervention; results instead showed adjacent evidence facilities, shell-space expansion, and modular storage practices.","queries":["law enforcement evidence storage facility planning modular future expansion","evidence facility phased construction independently operable storage","site:ojp.gov evidence storage overcrowding facility evidence preservation"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["property evidence room design standards ventilation security storage police","site:nist.gov SP 1500-33A evidence storage facility temperature humidity security sectioning","site:theiacp.org police facilities planning guidelines evidence future expansion shell space","site:archives.gov storage facility fire rated compartments modular HVAC expansion archives"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":"Searches using property room, evidence room, police facility, records module, shell space, mock-up, phased construction, and future growth found adjacent practices but no older term denoting the full proposed system.","queries":["Police Facility Planning Guidelines evidence property room future growth","property room facility shell space future growth","records storage module fire walls protected openings shelving aisle","full scale room mock-up layout storage accessibility workflow"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["Evidence preservation and integrity involve multidisciplinary evidence-management requirements.","Security of evidence/property rooms and condition-specific storage are fundamental, and deficiencies can impair evidentiary value.","Evidence-management requirements vary by evidence type and jurisdiction, limiting assumptions that every specialized class can share a simple core environment."],"publisher":"National Institute of Standards and Technology","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"Evidence Management Steering Committee Report: Opportunities to Strengthen Evidence Management Processes (NIST SP 1500-33A)","url":"https://www.nist.gov/publications/evidence-management-steering-committee-report-opportunities-strengthen-evidence"},{"claims_supported":["Police facilities can become inadequate for operational functions and require specialized planning.","The Orlando evidence facility integrated storage, crime-scene processing labs, training, high-density and bulk storage, vehicle processing, narcotics storage, and weapons storage.","The project provided 55,000 square feet of evidence space plus 27,000 square feet of shell space for future build-out, establishing adjacent evidence-domain phased-capacity practice."],"publisher":"International Association of Chiefs of Police","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Police Facilities Planning Guidelines Case Studies","url":"https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/Police_Facilities_Planning_Guidelines_CaseStudies.pdf"},{"claims_supported":["Storage buildings may be divided into bounded modules using rated fire walls and protected openings.","Module size, shelving geometry, aisle configuration, suppression, and accessibility materially affect storage safety.","Openings between storage modules should be avoided or protected, supporting scrutiny of capped passages and utility penetrations."],"publisher":"National Archives and Records Administration","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Special Challenges—Fire and Fire Suppression","url":"https://www.archives.gov/preservation/emergency-prep/special-challenges"},{"claims_supported":["A reversible full-scale physical mock-up can evaluate layout, storage, accessibility, workflow, and user experience before construction.","Representative furniture and equipment and structured stakeholder evaluation can make room-design conflicts observable.","A lightweight, modifiable mock-up can support iterative design without altering an operating facility."],"publisher":"Payette","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"TRADE_PROFESSIONAL","title":"Planning and Fabricating a Patient Room Mock-up","url":"https://www.payette.com/technology/planning-and-fabricating-a-patient-room-mock-up/"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded public-web screen found adjacent prior art, not proof of world novelty. It cannot establish that no patent, procurement record, code-compliant design, unpublished facility plan, foreign-language source, or implemented evidence repository contains the same combination; nor does it establish patentability, market size, expert acceptance, legal approval, or realized operational value."}