{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"CWRC Genre Ontology","overlap":"A literary-genre ontology designed for item classification and discussion of genre concepts; it treats genre definitions as situated and imperfect, records source provenance, supports broader/narrower relations, anticipates revision and crosswalking, and documents deprecation/version history.","remaining_difference":"It does not diagnose drift, hybridization, shock, replacement, or relabeling to select a transition regime, nor require boundary sensitivity, reviewer disagreement, retrieval, sunset, affected-party objection, or rollback-residue tests.","source_ids":["SRC4"]},{"name":"SKOS concept-scheme documentation and mapping","overlap":"Provides stable concept identifiers, change and history notes, and exact, close, broad, narrow, and related mappings between schemes; it explicitly warns that mappings do not replace provenance management.","remaining_difference":"It is a general representation standard, not a literary-genre change-diagnosis or decision protocol, and specifies no transition gates, temporal mechanism inference, parallel-label sunset, or empirical rollback test.","source_ids":["SRC1"]},{"name":"Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms governance","overlap":"An operational genre/form vocabulary with literary warrant, documented manuals, research-based proposals for additions and revisions, and precedents for separating, revising, restructuring, and cancelling terms.","remaining_difference":"It governs an authoritative cataloging vocabulary rather than a reversible local teaching-corpus experiment and does not expose the proposed multi-scale mechanism classifier, paired continuity/rupture ledger, or rollback comparison among five transition regimes.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"Mapping Mutable Genres in Structurally Complex Volumes","overlap":"Directly recognizes that genres change across centuries, adjusts genre classification across overlapping temporal windows, and demonstrates effects on corpus extraction in a large historical library.","remaining_difference":"It is an automated classification method focused on temporal model performance and corpus mining, not a provenance-preserving governance protocol that distinguishes social mechanisms, considers custodian objections, compares maintenance versus split or replacement, and rehearses reversal.","source_ids":["SRC3"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"In the proposed at-most-60-work pilot, the claim is falsified if mechanism diagnosis does not reproducibly alter or better explain the maintain/extend/split/parallel/replace decision relative to ordinary ontology review and SKOS-style crosswalking, or if it fails to improve legacy recovery, retrieval, and disagreement outcomes after rollback while adding unresolved terminology conflicts or excessive burden.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"For a disputed literary-genre boundary, adding multi-window mechanism discrimination and explicit transition-regime gates to provenance-preserving mappings will produce more reproducible and explicable corpus decisions, detect transition-specific risks, and permit cleaner rollback than a living ontology, ordinary vocabulary revision, temporal automated classification, or crosswalking alone.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"The bounded search covered the proposal wording, genre evolution and mutable-genre terminology, operational genre vocabularies and mapping standards, and combinations involving provenance, deprecation, crosswalks, parallel labeling, and rollback. Four opened sources span four publishers and include a normative standard, official library guidance, primary research, and a first-party literary ontology. No exact end-to-end protocol was found, although phrase misses are not treated as novelty evidence.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"The proposed nonbinding test is capped at 60 works, three windows, three reviewers, two boundary rules, and one rollback. SRC3 demonstrates that temporal genre variation and corpus membership can be tested empirically, while SRC1 and SRC4 supply practical mapping and provenance structures for a sandboxed crosswalk.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"Prior art separately supplies mutable temporal classification, genre-ontology revision, formal mappings, and vocabulary governance, but the searched sources do not couple mechanism diagnosis to a choice among maintenance, faceting, split, bounded parallelism, and replacement with measured rollback. That incremental claim has observable comparative outcomes.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"The authorized step is read-only and confines experimental labels to a nonbinding local bibliography. It preserves source labels, forbids changes to external records and consequential decisions, and assigns official changes to their custodians. This is compatible with LOC's formal proposal authority and CWRC's project-controlled revision process; no obvious safety stop applies before the bounded pilot.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"SRC3 directly identifies historical genre change as a classification problem for digital libraries. SRC4 says genre terms are inconsistently applied across controlled and folk systems, rejects a definitive taxonomy, and describes genre labeling as consequential for scholarship and discovery. SRC2's continuing revision and cancellation practice further shows that genre vocabularies change in operation.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The core problem is visible: literary genre categories are situated and inconsistently applied, genre behavior can change across historical time, and operational vocabularies require revision and crosswalking. The retained sources do not directly establish every claimed downstream harm, especially effects on community self-description or teaching interpretation, so support is partial.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P033","screen_survival":true,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":"No retained source combined temporal mechanism discrimination, continuity/rupture evidence, affected-party objections, time-limited parallel labels, retrieval monitoring, and rollback residue in one literary-taxonomy transition protocol.","queries":["\"genre taxonomy\" transition crosswalk provenance rollback literary corpus","\"genre ontology\" versioning deprecation crosswalk provenance","\"genre classification\" rollback crosswalk retrieval provenance","\"parallel labeling\" taxonomy transition sunset controlled vocabulary"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3","SRC4"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":"No exact named match for the complete proposed protocol was located; direct results instead covered mutable genre classification and a revisable literary ontology.","queries":["\"genre taxonomy\" transition crosswalk provenance rollback literary corpus","genre classification change historical labels provenance crosswalk library","literary genre taxonomy change classification transition provenance terms","\"literary genre\" classification disagreement historical corpus boundaries"],"source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["site:w3.org SKOS change note history note mapping exactMatch closeMatch specification","site:loc.gov genre form terms revisions cancellation hierarchy literary works proposal manual","taxonomy governance parallel labels sunset rollback crosswalk","site:loc.gov \"literary works\" LCGFT change terms hierarchy revisions"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["genre evolution taxonomy drift hybridization classification literary studies","literary genre classification historical change corpus boundaries computational study primary research","\"life cycles of genres\" Underwood genre boundaries corpus","genre ontology versioning mapping provenance literary corpus classification change"],"source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["SKOS is a normative concept-scheme standard.","It provides change notes, history notes, and typed cross-scheme mappings.","It distinguishes close from exact mapping and warns that mapping properties do not replace provenance management."],"publisher":"World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"OFFICIAL_STANDARD","title":"SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/"},{"claims_supported":["LCGFT is an operational stand-alone genre/form vocabulary with literary warrant.","New and revised terms are research-based and follow a proposal process.","Its history includes separation from LCSH, hierarchy revisions, and term-cancellation decisions."],"publisher":"Library of Congress","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Genre/Form Headings at the Library of Congress","url":"https://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/genreformgeneral.html"},{"claims_supported":["Historical libraries pose a genre-classification problem because genres can change gradually across time.","Overlapping classifiers were used to address historical change.","The approach was tested on 469,200 HathiTrust volumes and used to extract a fiction corpus."],"publisher":"IEEE International Conference on Big Data / arXiv","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"Mapping Mutable Genres in Structurally Complex Volumes","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.3323"},{"claims_supported":["A first-party literary genre ontology supports both work classification and discussion of genres as concepts.","Genre terms are situated, overlap across contexts, and are not consistently applied.","The ontology records definition provenance, uses SKOS relations, anticipates revision and crosswalking, and documents deprecation in its version history."],"publisher":"Canadian Writing Research Collaboratory","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","title":"CWRC Genre Ontology Preamble","url":"https://sparql.cwrc.ca/ontologies/genre-preamble-EN.html"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This coarse public-web screen found adjacent prior art for every major component but no opened source containing the complete literary-specific mechanism-diagnosis and reversible transition protocol. That bounded result supports only researchability and a remaining contrastive test; it cannot establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, or realized value."}