{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Data Provenance for Sport","overlap":"Models physical sport events and analytical workflows in one provenance graph, including data sources, manual and automated activities, agents and roles, corrections of irregular data, reproducibility, audit, and privacy-aware de-identification.","remaining_difference":"It does not make laboratory and adjudication assertions an append-only bitemporal source of truth or specify versioned event schemas, trial-eligibility projectors, unresolved-assertion frontiers, and deterministic manifest rebuild-and-diff.","source_ids":["SRC1"]},{"name":"W3C PROV","overlap":"Provides standard representations for entities, activities, agents, roles, derivation, revision, plans, time, responsibility, and provenance records capable of supporting process verification and reproduction.","remaining_difference":"PROV is a general interchange model, not a biomechanics-specific acceptance ledger or executable projection contract; it does not itself require immutable dual-time assertions or deterministic reconstruction of release trial membership.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"C3D biomechanics file format","overlap":"Co-locates synchronized motion and analog measurements with trial, subject, laboratory, acquisition, and processing parameters in a durable, extensible biomechanics format.","remaining_difference":"A C3D file remains a trial-centered artifact rather than an append-only history of protocol deviations, competing annotations, eligibility adjudications, corrections, and release projections across multiple artifacts.","source_ids":["SRC3"]},{"name":"BIDS Motion specification","overlap":"Standardizes motion recordings, tracking-system identities, source-data placement, acquisition and run labels, synchronization, events, equipment software versions, channel quality status, and structured metadata.","remaining_difference":"It organizes files and acquisition metadata but does not prescribe canonical correction and adjudication events, event/record time, versioned eligibility projectors, visible decision conflicts, or replay against a preserved release manifest.","source_ids":["SRC4"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The contrast is falsified if a conventional package using C3D or BIDS Motion files plus PROV-compatible workflow metadata, without a canonical append-only assertion ledger, can deterministically reproduce the same release trial manifest and declared lineage invariants after retrospective identity corrections, changed eligibility adjudications, and processing-version changes.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"For a biomechanics analysis release, bounded protocol, calibration, synchronization, adjudication, correction, and processing assertions are canonical, while trial manifests and dataset lineages are disposable versioned projections with explicit conflicts, frontiers, and deterministic rebuild-and-diff. The retained file standards and provenance models cover many ingredients but not this combined executable contract.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"PASS: searches covered the proposal directly, provenance/workflow synonyms and historical formats, current motion-data standards and practices, and combinations involving event sourcing, bitemporality, corrections, projections, and replay. Four directly opened sources from four publishers were retained; absence of the exact phrase was not treated as novelty evidence.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"PASS: a copied, de-identified completed-session bundle can supply C3D/BIDS-like recordings and metadata, while the sport-provenance work supplies a relevant reconstruction target. Freezing event definitions, identity rules, projector code, and invariants permits a bounded comparison of manifest equality, missing links, conflicts, obsolete calibration references, and nondeterminism.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"PASS: the proposal is testably narrower than general provenance or standardized motion files: it predicts that deterministic release reconstruction across late corrections requires canonical bounded assertions and a pinned projector. Failure to outperform a file-plus-workflow package on the frozen reconstruction test would reject that contrast.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"PASS: no retained source creates an obvious stop for a read-only, de-identified prototype under existing approvals. SRC1 specifically recognizes human-participant privacy, de-identification, and differentiated provenance access; the proposed boundary leaves interpretation and governance authority with authorized personnel.","source_ids":["SRC1"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"PASS: prior work reports limited ability to reproduce or audit sport analyses when their data sources and manual and automated derivations lack provenance. C3D was designed partly because separate notes and test information become detached, while BIDS Motion documents heterogeneous proprietary formats and formalizes synchronization and quality metadata. Evidence is indirect for the proposal's exact correction-and-eligibility failure mode, so overall support is partial rather than conclusive.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The general lineage problem is visible: sports-analysis provenance research identifies difficulty tracing irregular data and reproducing mixed manual/automated derivations; C3D addresses loss of trial context when metadata travels separately; and BIDS Motion standardizes fragmented motion-recording, synchronization, and quality metadata. The retained sources do not quantify how often biomechanics release manifests specifically lose superseded eligibility, calibration, or correction history.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P037","screen_survival":true,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":"No retained source directly combined append-only dual-time biomechanics assertions, unresolved adjudication conflicts, versioned trial-manifest projection, and deterministic rebuild-and-diff.","queries":["event sourcing scientific data provenance append-only laboratory corrections bitemporal","biomechanics trial data provenance calibration processing reproducibility dataset lineage","W3C PROV provenance versioned scientific workflow corrections"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["biomechanics trial data provenance calibration processing reproducibility dataset lineage","Data Provenance for Sport provenance sport performance analysis workflow paper","biomechanics reproducible workflow raw data trial selection processing scripts"],"source_ids":["SRC1"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["motion capture biomechanics metadata standard calibration trial processing provenance","BIDS motion capture biomechanics standard metadata trials events calibration provenance","biomechanics data standard trial metadata calibration C3D processing history"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["scientific workflow provenance sport performance analysis audit reproducibility","C3D biomechanics trial information processing history","motion capture data lineage audit trail provenance graph"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["Sport performance analysis mixes manual annotation and automated derivation.","Without provenance for processes and sources, the analysis has limited reproducibility and auditability.","The proposed sport notation connects physical events with workflow provenance, agents and roles, and addresses de-identification and differentiated access.","W3C PROV and VisTrails, without extensions, omit important executable or manual-workflow details."],"publisher":"Cornell University, arXiv","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"Data Provenance for Sport","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.05804"},{"claims_supported":["PROV represents entities, activities, agents, roles, derivation, revision, plans, and time.","Provenance records can help verify processes and reproduce how an object was generated.","PROV is a general provenance-interchange model rather than an executable domain workflow."],"publisher":"World Wide Web Consortium","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"OFFICIAL_STANDARD","title":"PROV Model Primer","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-primer/"},{"claims_supported":["C3D is a longstanding biomechanics storage standard for synchronized 3D and analog trial data.","It stores measurement data with descriptive trial and laboratory parameters because separate notes and test information can become detached.","The format permits user- and laboratory-defined metadata but is centered on files and trials."],"publisher":"C3D.ORG / Motion Lab Systems","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"OFFICIAL_STANDARD","title":"C3D.ORG — The biomechanics standard file format","url":"https://www.c3d.org/"},{"claims_supported":["BIDS Motion standardizes motion files, tracking-system identifiers, events, acquisition/run labels, sidecar metadata, synchronization, source-data placement, software versions, and channel quality.","It acknowledges heterogeneous proprietary motion-capture formats.","It is a file-and-metadata specification and does not prescribe append-only adjudication history or release-manifest replay."],"publisher":"BIDS Maintainers","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"OFFICIAL_STANDARD","title":"Motion — Brain Imaging Data Structure v1.9.0","url":"https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/v1.9.0/modality-specific-files/motion.html"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded four-source screen supports only an adjacent-prior-art disposition. It does not establish world novelty, patentability, freedom to operate, market size, expert acceptance, implementation feasibility at scale, or realized scientific value; additional patent, product, repository, and practitioner searches could reveal a closer implementation."}