{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Quantifying Contextual Interference and Its Effect on Skill Transfer in Skilled Youth Tennis Players","overlap":"Directly studies tennis-serve transfer from practice to competition, contrasts blocked and more variable practice, includes responding opponents, films and codes practice, counterbalances practice order, and recognizes that unverified serve intention can create classification error. It also considers practice specificity as an alternative explanation.","remaining_difference":"It evaluates group-level practice schedules rather than an individual case memo that separates observations from interpretations, compares cue dependence with pressure, tactics, environment, physical limitation, and coding error, and uses a preregistered late-returner-cue probe plus revision log.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"Taekwondo Fighting in Training Does Not Simulate the Affective and Cognitive Demands of Competition","overlap":"Compares training and competition traces, links transfer to opponent information and movement, and shows that perceptual, affective, cognitive, and interpersonal constraints can jointly alter behavior.","remaining_difference":"It diagnoses representativeness at a study level; it does not provide the proposed event-bounded rival-explanation matrix, athlete-intent check, reversible single-case cue manipulation, or longitudinal explanation record.","source_ids":["SRC1"]},{"name":"Preventing a Loss of Accuracy of the Tennis Serve Under Pressure","overlap":"Addresses a rehearsed tennis serve deteriorating under competitive pressure, uses a controlled manipulation and predeclared performance outcome, records consent, and notes that choking is an imprecise label unless intention and substantial underperformance are established.","remaining_difference":"It begins with pressure-induced choking as the study frame and does not first compare opponent-contingent tactics, representativeness, environmental conditions, physical limitation, and coding uncertainty or manipulate returner cues to discriminate those rivals.","source_ids":["SRC3"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The contrast is falsified if an opened prior-art system is shown to already combine event-level observation–interpretation separation, explicit pressure/tactical/environmental/physical/coding rivals, athlete-confirmed intent, a preregistered counterbalanced late-opponent-cue probe, action limits, and revision logging; empirically, it is also falsified if blinded coders cannot reliably identify the bounded events or the probe does not discriminate the recorded explanations better than outcome-only or ordinary representative-practice assessment.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"Existing work separately supplies representative-practice assessment, competition-transfer experiments, alternative-mechanism discussion, and pressure interventions. The remaining testable contrast is whether one action-limited memo can integrate those elements to preserve tactical and measurement rivals and make a reversible cue-only practice change function as a discriminating probe rather than a presumed treatment.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"The bounded search covered the proposal directly, representative-learning and transfer-specificity terminology, blocked/contextual-interference practice, tennis and opponent-related practice methods, pressure/choking research, professional-scope standards, and combinations involving video coding, intention, opponent cues, and rival explanations. Four opened sources from three publishers were retained. Failure to locate the exact memo phrase is not treated as novelty evidence.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"Independent recoding of existing video followed by one consented, low-volume, counterbalanced static-versus-late-cue block is reversible and produces candidate-specific observations. Related studies demonstrate naturalistic video coding, counterbalanced practice manipulation, transfer testing, and controlled tennis-serve pressure manipulation; professional limits remain applicable.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"The proposal predicts that errors will covary more strongly with late opponent cues than with score pressure, conditions, symptoms, tactical intent, or coding uncertainty, and that the integrated memo will discriminate these explanations better than repetition or an automatic choking label. The retained literature establishes adjacent components but not that integrated comparison.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"The authorized probe is voluntary, low-volume, non-punitive, and limited to ordinary technique and reversible cue variation. Psychological diagnosis and assessment are excluded and referred to qualified professionals, consistent with ISSP requirements concerning competence, informed consent, avoidance of harm, confidentiality, and referral beyond scope.","source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"Research shows that performance in closed or blocked practice can diverge from competition transfer, that opponent and competition constraints can change behavior, and that pressure can independently reduce serve accuracy. The exact recurring late-returner pattern is not directly established by these sources, but the broader ambiguous transfer problem is visible.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The general problem is visible: practice success does not necessarily predict competition transfer, and opponent information, contextual-interference structure, affective-cognitive demands, tactical intention, and pressure can yield different explanations for an apparent execution failure. Evidence is partial because none of the retained studies demonstrates the proposal's exact protocol-matched, late-returner-position discrepancy.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P046","screen_survival":true,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":"No retained source tested the exact combination of late returner movement, verified serve intent, rival-cause matrix, blinded event coding, and an abduction log; this bounded miss is not evidence of novelty.","queries":["tennis serve late returner movement position target choice study","sport performance analysis rival hypotheses coaching video coding","tennis serve pressure tactical intention execution distinction observational analysis"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":"No exact competition-transfer explanation memo implementing the full proposed workflow was located.","queries":["practice competition transfer serve late opponent position representative learning design","competition transfer explanation memo sport skill rival explanations","athlete performance case formulation alternative hypotheses sport psychology"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["representative practice assessment tool tennis coaches","tennis practice opponent serve transfer test","official sport psychology scope psychological assessment athlete consent coaching"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["representative learning design transfer specificity sport practice perceptual cues","contextual interference blocked practice tennis serve competition transfer","choking under pressure tennis serve multiple mechanisms"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["Training and competition may impose different perceptual, affective, cognitive, and interpersonal constraints.","Opponent movement supplies action-relevant information, and low-fidelity training behavior may compromise transfer.","Representative practice based only on surface information may still fail to reproduce competition affordances."],"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"Taekwondo Fighting in Training Does Not Simulate the Affective and Cognitive Demands of Competition: Implications for Behavior and Transfer","url":"https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00025/full"},{"claims_supported":["Blocked practice can improve a closed tennis-serve skill test without improving competition transfer, while more contextual interference produced the opposite pattern.","The study used filmed naturalistic practice, responding opponents, counterbalanced scheduling, and match-play transfer tests.","The authors identify unverified serve intention as a classification limitation and discuss practice specificity as an alternative explanation."],"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"Quantifying Contextual Interference and Its Effect on Skill Transfer in Skilled Youth Tennis Players","url":"https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01931/full"},{"claims_supported":["Competitive pressure can reduce tennis-serve accuracy under controlled conditions.","The choking label has recognized definitional and intention-related limitations.","A small controlled manipulation can test a preregistered performance prediction, although the reported mechanism remained uncertain."],"publisher":"PLOS","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"Preventing a Loss of Accuracy of the Tennis Serve Under Pressure","url":"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0255060"},{"claims_supported":["Psychological services and assessments must remain within professional competence.","Assessment requires informed consent, explanation of purpose and limits, confidentiality protections, and proper data handling.","Practitioners should avoid harm and refer matters beyond their qualifications to competent professionals."],"publisher":"International Society of Sport Psychology","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"OFFICIAL_STANDARD","title":"The International Society of Sport Psychology Ethical Code for Sport Psychology Practice","url":"https://issponline.org/wp-content/uploads/ISSP-R_Ethics_Code.pdf"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This coarse, bounded public-web screen supports only an adjacent-prior-art disposition. It cannot establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, realized value, or absence of undiscovered academic, proprietary, coaching, or patent implementations."}