{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Ireland's phased transition from adult wardship to supported decision-making","overlap":"New wardship applications ended while existing wards entered a multi-year, individually adjudicated review process with capacity-specific outcomes, legal representation, tiered decision supports, and case-by-case handling of funds. This closely matches the proposal's prospective restriction plus staged judicial review of legacy orders.","remaining_difference":"The retained sources do not describe an object-specific authority transition ledger, readiness-gated cohorts, cross-institution document-validity rehearsals, explicit service-continuity stop triggers, compensation pathways, or sunsets for transitional proof-of-authority instruments.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]},{"name":"Decision Support Service codes and operational framework","overlap":"The framework separates decision domains, provides tiered least-restrictive supports, regulates supporters, maintains oversight and complaints processes, addresses financial-service and healthcare actors, and allows arrangements to be amended or replaced as needs change.","remaining_difference":"It is an operating support-and-oversight framework rather than the proposed causal-diagnostic ledger and cohort-advancement system; no comparative mechanism tracing or controlled document-rejection rehearsal was found.","source_ids":["SRC3"]},{"name":"Uniform Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Other Protective Arrangements Act","overlap":"UGCOPAA establishes person-centered, preference-sensitive, least-restrictive guardianship standards resembling the proposal's prospective gate and domain-limited approach.","remaining_difference":"The retained ULC source does not supply the proposed legacy-order inventory, staged transition cohorts, continuity controls, or cross-institution cutover testing for a statutory regime change.","source_ids":["SRC4"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The remaining claim would be falsified if a bounded comparison with ordinary phased individualized review shows that the ledger, readiness gates, and document rehearsals do not improve timely detection or correction of obsolete authority, incompatible documents, missing supports, fund-management problems, or service interruptions, or instead materially prolong restrictive authority or add procedural burden.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"Against already-established phased individualized transition practice, an object-specific authority ledger combined with readiness-gated cohorts, cross-institution document rehearsals, stop triggers, and transitional-instrument sunsets will detect and prevent rights/continuity failures earlier than phased court review, forms, guidance, and supporter oversight alone.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"The bounded search covered the proposal directly, historical wardship terminology, model-law and operational practices, and combinations involving review, capacity assessment, funds, documents, and institutional reliance. Four opened sources span four publishers and include primary research and official guidance.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"The proposed eight-week study is limited to 30 de-identified files, up to 12 voluntary interviews, and three nonbinding document scenarios. Ireland's observed transition barriers and existing court/DSS procedures provide concrete coding and comparison targets without requiring changes to any order.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"Although phased individualized transition is prior art, the incremental claim about a typed ledger, readiness gates, document rehearsals, stop triggers, and sunsets remains distinct and can be tested against ordinary phased review using delay, document rejection, support availability, fund continuity, and obsolete-authority detection outcomes.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"The evidence step is de-identified, voluntary, compensated, non-adjudicative, and changes no entitlement. The proposal correctly reserves individual authority decisions to courts and legislation; official Irish practice likewise places review, representation, capacity findings, and fund disposition within authorized court and statutory-service processes.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"Primary transition research found that 74% of Ireland's adult wards remained in wardship late in the three-year transition, with concerns about post-discharge fund management, loss of supports, unfamiliar procedures, and information gaps. Official practice separately manages legacy wardship, individual review, support arrangements, and funds, making asynchronous legal and operational change directly visible.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The problem is visible: a rights-based legal cutover can coexist with slow legacy-case discharge and unresolved operational dependencies. Ireland's primary research documents backlog, fund-management concerns, support discontinuity concerns, and information gaps, while official sources show that old authority persists until individualized review and that property, representation, and successor support arrangements require separate case-level processing.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P047","screen_survival":true,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["guardianship reform successor documents banks benefits continuity authority documents","Ireland wardship transition implementation challenges banks benefits supported decision making report","site:hse.ie \"Transition from Wardship\" Decision Support Service register review court"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["guardianship reform existing orders phased review transition supported decision making wards court three years","\"guardianship\" \"transition\" \"existing orders\" limited supported decision-making"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["UGCOPAA existing guardianship orders transition effective date review official","site:uniformlaws.org UGCOPAA guardianship supported decision making existing orders","site:decisionsupportservice.ie \"wardship\" \"transition\" assets discharge"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["site:courts.ie wardship review phased basis priority transition decision support service","site:decisionsupportservice.ie wardship transition review existing wards documents register","Ireland wardship transition phased review existing wards of court"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["Ireland required all adult wards to exit wardship through court review.","The transition was slower than anticipated: 1,602 of 2,173 adults remained in wardship at the end of November 2025.","Primary research identified post-discharge fund management, possible loss of supports, unfamiliarity, and information gaps as transition barriers.","The study used administrative data, interviews, stakeholder interviews, and observations of more than 60 hearings."],"publisher":"National Disability Authority","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"Research on the Transition from Wardship","url":"https://nda.ie/publications/research-on-the-transition-from-wardship"},{"claims_supported":["The court system provides capacity-assessment templates, discharge provisions, and separate sample provisions for co-decision-makers and decision-making representatives.","Existing wards who do not apply for discharge are still subject to statutory review.","The process addresses legal aid, service requirements, and management of assets after discharge."],"publisher":"Courts Service of Ireland","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Discharge from wardship: Resources for solicitors","url":"https://www.courts.ie/guides/discharge-from-wardship"},{"claims_supported":["New wardship applications ended while all current wards entered statutory review.","Existing authority remains administered during transition until court discharge.","Adults receive an opportunity to be heard and access to representation and legal aid.","Capacity, successor decision support, committee authority, and court-held funds are resolved individually.","DSS codes cover supporters, advocates, financial-service providers, healthcare professionals, supervision, complaints, and least-restrictive decision-specific supports."],"publisher":"Decision Support Service","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Wards of Court","url":"https://www.decisionsupportservice.ie/resources/wards-court"},{"claims_supported":["UGCOPAA is a comprehensive model guardianship statute.","It promotes person-centered planning based on preferences and values.","It requires courts to use the least-restrictive protective arrangement necessary."],"publisher":"Uniform Law Commission","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"OFFICIAL_STANDARD","title":"Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Other Protective Arrangements Act","url":"https://www.uniformlaws.org/acts/catalog/current/g"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded four-source screen found close adjacent practice, especially Ireland's phased individualized transition from wardship, but did not find the full ledger-plus-readiness-gates-plus-document-rehearsal combination. That absence cannot establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, or realized value, and unsearched statutes, court programs, implementation manuals, scholarship, and non-English sources may contain closer matches."}