{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"UK delegated-powers memorandum and scrutiny practice","overlap":"Requires every delegated power in a bill to be identified, justified, bounded by safeguards, and assigned a scrutiny procedure.","remaining_difference":"It does not establish a heat-specific independently commencing core, classify postponed ambitions, impose a cumulative authority-complexity budget, or stage deferred powers through module-specific commencement gates.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"House of Lords emergency-powers safeguards","overlap":"Favors hazard-specific legal authority, legislative scrutiny, sunset provisions, review of existing powers, and avoidance of temporary emergency authority spilling into permanence.","remaining_difference":"It does not prescribe severable authority modules or test whether separating a bounded operational core from additional powers improves enactability and legal operability.","source_ids":["SRC3"]},{"name":"New York City cooling-center legislation","overlap":"Demonstrates a comparatively bounded municipal heat-response statute with heat triggers, cooling-center activation, interagency consultation, public information, accessibility provisions, and recurring reporting.","remaining_difference":"It is a substantive heat program, not a protocol for decomposing a successor bill containing procurement, entry, evacuation, enforcement, data-sharing, and all-hazards powers.","source_ids":["SRC4"]},{"name":"Local heat-action-plan component practice","overlap":"Empirical review found recurring components matching much of the proposed core: activation triggers, warnings, cooling centers, surveillance, agency coordination, vulnerable-population outreach, and transportation access.","remaining_difference":"The research evaluates operational plan content, not legislative delegation, severability, cumulative authority burden, staged enactment, or preservation of predecessor constraint functions.","source_ids":["SRC1"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The claim would be falsified if independent reviewers cannot reliably distinguish core continuity from new authority; current law or operational dependencies make the proposed core inseparable from broader powers; or comparison with unified drafting shows that modularization neither reduces blocking dependencies nor produces a more determinate, independently operable core.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"For a municipal heat successor that has accumulated additional emergency powers, independently classifying provisions and placing non-core powers behind both module-specific and cumulative authority gates will expose avoidable legal dependencies and leave a more determinate, independently commencing heat-response core than negotiating the same provisions as one package.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"The bounded search covered the proposal directly, older and synonymous concepts such as sunsets and hazard-specific emergency powers, actual heat-response legislation and plans, delegated-powers practice, severability, scrutiny, and combinations involving broad emergency authority. Four opened sources from four publishers were retained, including primary research and official government sources. No retained source disclosed the complete proposed protocol.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"A 21-day, read-only dual classification and dependency-mapping exercise is bounded, reversible, and capable of reporting agreement rates, uncited authority, false core classifications, nonseverable dependencies, and cumulative interface counts without changing law or operations.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"Existing sources separately cover heat-plan components, bounded heat legislation, per-power justification, scrutiny, and sunset safeguards, but not the claimed comparative effect of a fixed heat core plus module-specific and cumulative admission gates on successor launchability.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"The proposed evidence step is limited to records review and a nonbinding ledger; it reserves enactment to the council and preserves existing executive, inspector-general, and judicial authority. Local counsel must still verify confidentiality, records-access, privilege, and jurisdiction-specific inseparability before review begins.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"Sources show that heat response routinely combines numerous operational components and agencies, while official legislative guidance treats each delegated power, safeguard, and scrutiny route as requiring separate justification. Emergency-powers experience also shows risks from wide-ranging fast-tracked authority and spillover into permanence. No retained source documents the proposal's exact municipal draft or proves that bundling has blocked its enactment, so support is partial.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The general problem is visible: municipal heat response has a recognizable bounded operational core, and broader emergency delegation creates documented scrutiny, clarity, and permanence concerns. The specific asserted stockpile of postponed municipal powers and its effect on enactment were not independently observed in this bounded search.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P066","screen_survival":true,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["legislative drafting severability separate delegated powers scrutiny checklist","empirical study legislative complexity omnibus bills scrutiny enactment complexity delegation","municipal emergency operations ordinance all hazards procurement data sharing evacuation authority"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":"No direct match was found for a municipal heat-successor protocol combining a fixed core, severable authority modules, a cumulative authority-complexity budget, and staged commencement gates.","queries":["municipal heat emergency ordinance permanent cooling centers alerts emergency powers severability","emergency legislation omnibus broad powers legal clarity sunset scrutiny report"],"source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["model heat ordinance local government cooling centers emergency response legal authority","municipal extreme heat ordinance model policy cooling centers transportation welfare checks reporting","legislative drafting severability separate delegated powers scrutiny checklist"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["emergency powers legislation modular drafting severable modules sunset clauses oversight","emergency legislation omnibus broad powers legal clarity sunset scrutiny report","legislative drafting severability separate delegated powers scrutiny checklist"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["Local heat-action plans commonly contain activation triggers, risk communication, cooling centers, surveillance, agency coordination, and outreach to at-risk populations.","The reviewed plans also frequently addressed transportation access, while implementation and evaluation gaps remained."],"publisher":"American Public Health Association","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"Planning to Reduce the Health Impacts of Extreme Heat: A Content Analysis of Heat Action Plans in Local United States Jurisdictions","url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36926967/"},{"claims_supported":["The scope and rationale of every delegated power and its safeguards should be tested and justified.","Bills should enumerate proposed delegated powers and explain their inclusion and scrutiny procedure; skeleton provisions require special justification and express limitations."],"publisher":"UK Cabinet Office","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Guide to Making Legislation","url":"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guide-to-making-legislation/guide-to-making-legislation-html--2"},{"claims_supported":["Exceptional emergency powers should return to the legislature without spilling into permanence.","Wide-ranging emergency legislation can curtail scrutiny, while hazard-specific powers, sunset provisions, legal clarity, and legislative votes are recognized safeguards."],"publisher":"UK Parliament, House of Lords Constitution Committee","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"COVID-19 and the Use and Scrutiny of Emergency Powers","url":"https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/6212/documents/69015/default/"},{"claims_supported":["A municipal code can define a bounded heat-related emergency and require cooling-center designation, alerts, accessibility information, interagency consultation, public planning, and reporting.","The enacted structure demonstrates that core heat-response functions can be expressed without incorporating general evacuation, entry, enforcement, or all-hazards powers."],"publisher":"New York City Council","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"OTHER","title":"Int. No. 998-A: A Local Law in Relation to Cooling Centers","url":"https://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?GUID=11C62CCD-11B9-4BC1-8C5A-58D2331B869B&ID=6788501&Options=Advanced&Search="}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded four-source public-web screen found adjacent practices but no complete match. It cannot establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, realized value, or the absence of unindexed municipal drafts, legal memoranda, procurement materials, foreign-language authorities, or patents."}