{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Preston Manor blue-wool dosimeter program","overlap":"Eleven location-specific physical dosimeters accumulate light dose, are collected, photographed beside an unexposed control, translated into exposure estimates, compared across locations, and returned for longitudinal reanalysis and conservation recommendations.","remaining_difference":"It covers light only, retains the same witnesses on an annual cadence, and does not describe monthly replacement, batch and interval reconciliation, rejection rules, or integration of every harvested witness into linked location and collection histories.","source_ids":["SRC1"]},{"name":"Museums Galleries Scotland cumulative-light monitoring workflow","overlap":"Sector guidance combines cumulative dosimeters, consistent placement, contextual metadata, recorded findings, reporting, and use of results in collection decisions.","remaining_difference":"It does not prescribe a coupon-level transfer protocol with unexposed batch controls, durable witness-to-entry identifiers, replacement tracking, or missing-transfer reconciliation.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"Established environmental monitoring and documentation framework","overlap":"Official sources require or recommend monitoring light, RH, and pollutants at appropriate locations, maintaining longitudinal records, calibrating instruments, using reporting forms, documenting findings, and routing significant conditions to designated authorities.","remaining_difference":"They do not expressly require replaceable passive material witnesses to be consolidated through a controlled transformation into provenance-linked conservation histories.","source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The remaining contrast is falsified if further direct evidence shows that routine conservation practice already harvests replaceable passive light, humidity-time, or vapor witnesses under batch controls and rejection rules, then reconciles each station, interval, witness, durable history entry, and successor; it is also experimentally falsified if the pilot cannot preserve reliable, uniquely linked exposure evidence beyond existing monitoring.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"A narrower claim remains: a governed two-store workflow spanning multiple environmental hazards, in which every bounded-life local witness is validated, converted into an uncertainty-bearing exposure band, linked to a durable location and collection history, reconciled with its control and successor, and never independently authorizes collection or facilities action. The passive-witness and recordkeeping elements themselves are not distinct.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"The bounded search covered direct intervention language, blue-wool and diffusion-tube terminology, actual museum practice, historical instrumentation guidance, reporting practices, and governing standards. Four opened sources from four publishers were retained.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"The proposed 30-day, 12-station shadow pilot is limited and measurable. Controls, blinded readings, independent spot measurements, agreement, drift, saturation, provenance, workload, and reconciliation provide predefined rejection evidence without changing collections or facilities.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"Although the broad intervention substantially overlaps existing practice, the narrower claim about mandatory coupon-level validation, durable linkage, successor reconciliation, and multi-hazard transfer remains operationally distinguishable and falsifiable.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"A no-contact deployment of commercially manufactured witnesses under preservation-officer and conservator control has no evident categorical stop. The exclusions, immediate removal rule, control-failure stop, and reservation of facilities and collection decisions to authorized staff address the salient risks.","source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"The sources establish cumulative environmental damage, the importance of local or object-oriented placement, measurable differences between nearby locations, microclimates, and the need for recorded longitudinal environmental information. They do not directly establish how often later conservation investigations lack pre-damage exposure histories.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"SUBSTANTIAL_COLLISION","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The physical premise is visible: Preston Manor dosimeters showed different cumulative doses by orientation, window proximity, and lighting location, while guidance distinguishes cumulative exposure from spot readings and official standards recognize cabinet or case microclimates and require environmental recording. The asserted prevalence of missing pre-damage histories is not directly measured by the retained sources.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P067","screen_survival":false,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["museum passive dosimeter \"record\" environmental monitoring conservation","conservation passive exposure indicators documented records location museum"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC4"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["museum conservation passive dosimeter light dose strips cumulative exposure collections","museum environmental monitoring record keeping location shelf cabinet microclimate standards"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["collections conservation humidity indicator card passive cumulative time humidity indicator","site:canada.ca museum blue wool dosimeter light monitoring record"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["museum passive diffusion tube pollutant monitoring dosimeter conservation storage","\"blue wool\" dosimeter record museum exposure log"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC4"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["An actual museum deployed eleven blue-wool dosimeters at different locations.","The witnesses were collected and photographed beside an unexposed control.","Location-specific fading was converted into cumulative dose estimates, used for recommendations, and retained for future longitudinal analysis."],"publisher":"Brighton & Hove Museums","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","title":"Shedding Light on Preston Manor and Other Updates","url":"https://brightonmuseums.org.uk/discovery/history-stories/shedding-light-on-preston-manor-and-other-updates/"},{"claims_supported":["Cumulative dosimeters are an established museum-monitoring instrument.","Monitoring placement should reflect the object or location and remain consistent.","Standard practice includes contextual records, reports, and application of findings to collection decisions."],"publisher":"Museums Galleries Scotland","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Monitoring light and UV radiation","url":"https://www.museumsgalleriesscotland.org.uk/advice-article/monitoring-light-and-uv-radiation-in-museums/"},{"claims_supported":["Official standards recognize small-area microclimates such as storage cabinets and exhibit cases.","Light, UV, air pollutants, temperature, and RH must be monitored and recorded under specified conditions.","Environmental findings are routed to designated authorities, monitoring equipment should be maintained and calibrated, and collection examination findings must be documented."],"publisher":"U.S. Department of the Interior","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"OFFICIAL_STANDARD","title":"Required Standards for Managing and Preserving Museum Property, Directive 4","url":"https://www.doi.gov/sites/default/files/migrated/museum/policy/upload/Dir-4_Required-Stds-Collections-Preservation.pdf"},{"claims_supported":["Museum environmental monitoring and continuous records were established concerns by 1980.","The guidance covers RH, temperature, light, and air pollution and includes sample reporting forms.","It discusses calibration, periodic chart replacement, reference measurements, and monitoring multiple locations."],"publisher":"Canadian Conservation Institute, National Museums of Canada","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Recommended Environmental Monitors for Museums, Archives and Art Galleries","url":"https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2018/pch/CH57-3-1-3-1980-eng.pdf"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded four-source screen finds substantial collision with established passive dosimetry, local monitoring, control comparison, environmental recordkeeping, and longitudinal use. It does not establish whether the narrower reconciled multi-hazard witness-to-history protocol exists elsewhere, nor can it establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, or realized preservation value."}