{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Endings Principles for sustainable digital-edition design and release management","overlap":"Uses documented data and processing, version control, dependency restraint, graceful failure, and release management to keep complex digital editions maintainable and preservable. Its case studies directly show recurring infrastructure maintenance consuming capacity.","remaining_difference":"It does not reconstruct the useful functions of a successful predecessor’s constraints or use dossiers, cumulative editorial-review budgets, and triggered tiers to distinguish textual parity from post-success interpretive ambitions.","source_ids":["SRC1"]},{"name":"MLA Statement on the Scholarly Edition in the Digital Age","overlap":"Requires declared purposes and methods, documented constraints and changes, appropriate fit between features and scholarly goals, accuracy, useful apparatus, and planning for longevity.","remaining_difference":"It supplies evaluation principles rather than a successor-specific admission gate, fixed complexity budget, protected launch contract, or legitimate deferral ladder derived from predecessor constraints.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"TEI critical-apparatus modularity combined with EditionCrafter’s sustainable static publishing","overlap":"TEI permits classified apparatus entries and external apparatus linked to a base text, while EditionCrafter integrates primary sources, commentary, and analysis in low-maintenance static editions. Together they address technical separation, publication, and sustainability.","remaining_difference":"Technical modularity and a lightweight platform do not themselves limit the number of interpretive layers, compare cumulative review and preservation burdens, protect a textual launch tier, or record why predecessor limits aided closure.","source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The contrastive claim is falsified if independent editors applying the charter to the same 20-item backlog cannot classify items consistently, or if the resulting launch set is essentially unchanged from ordinary backlog negotiation and reveals no additional cumulative review, dependency, preservation, usability, or fallback conflict.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"For a successor to a demonstrably successful constrained pilot, recording the focusing functions of the predecessor’s constraints and jointly applying a scope firewall, cumulative burden budget, and triggered deferral tiers will preserve a launchable textual core in a way not represented by goal-alignment guidance, technical modularity, lightweight publishing, or ordinary item-level review alone.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"Four search lanes covered direct successor-edition overload language, minimal-computing and historical terminology, official editorial and encoding guidance, first-party publishing tools, and combinations of apparatus, dependency, preservation, and release-management subproblems. Exactly four opened sources span four publisher organizations and include primary research, official guidance, an official standard, and a first-party product.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"The proposed two-hour, read-only classification of 20 backlog items is bounded and produces auditable outputs: classification agreement, launch-set differences, unresolved dependencies, review-hour estimates, apparatus-type counts, preservation burdens, and fallback viability. It makes no implementation or efficacy commitment.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"The sources establish adjacent practices—goal-method fit, documented constraints, modular apparatus, dependency restraint, release management, and sustainable static publication—but none combines them around the release of a successful predecessor’s specific constraints. The remaining difference can be tested against ordinary backlog negotiation on a fixed sample.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"The evidence step is read-only, preserves access to the pilot, makes no schema or publication commitment, assigns final approval to the publication authority and general editor, preserves textual and specialist review authority, and includes a renderability halt and rollback path. No obvious safety stop appears; viewpoint-discriminatory use is expressly excluded.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"Primary project evidence shows sophisticated digital editions accumulating recurring maintenance burdens that threatened capacity, while MLA guidance recognizes proliferating annotation and commentary layers and requires their fit with editorial goals and longevity. Sustainable lightweight tooling addresses the same practical pressure. The narrower pilot-to-successor ambition-release sequence was not directly documented, so support is partial rather than complete.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The general problem is visible: feature-rich digital editions can acquire infrastructure and dependency burdens that consume maintenance capacity, while additional annotation, commentary, interfaces, and interpretive layers require explicit justification against scholarly purpose and long-term support. Public evidence does not directly establish the proposal’s more specific causal pattern in which a successful narrow pilot releases deferred theoretical ambitions into one successor backlog.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC4"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P071","screen_survival":true,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["digital scholarly edition scope creep apparatus complexity project management successor edition pilot","successor digital scholarly edition rebuild scope apparatus annotation complexity","digital scholarly edition failed unsustainable complexity annotation project case study"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["digital scholarly edition project charter scope sustainability launch minimum viable edition","successor digital scholarly edition rebuild scope apparatus annotation complexity","digital scholarly edition scope creep apparatus complexity project management successor edition pilot"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["MLA guidelines scholarly editions digital preservation apparatus review criteria","Endings Project principles digital longevity scholarly editions preserve static site dependency","TEI critical apparatus stand-off annotation modular scholarly digital edition guidelines","NINES best practices digital scholarly editions scope project management sustainability"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["critical edition minimum viable edition modular annotation preservation guidelines","minimal computing digital scholarly editions sustainability scope editorial","scholarly edition project charter scope sustainability launch minimum viable edition"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC4"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["Case studies of older digital editions found sophisticated backend stacks required repeated, time-consuming maintenance and generated a burden threatening support capacity.","The Endings approach recommends low-dependency products, version control, graceful failure, and release management for sustainable digital editions."],"publisher":"Digital Humanities Quarterly","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"From Tamagotchis to Pet Rocks: On Learning to Love Simplicity through the Endings Principles","url":"https://dhq.digitalhumanities.org/vol/17/1/000668/000668.html"},{"claims_supported":["Digital editions can add annotation, commentary, editorial-information layers, and exploratory interfaces.","Digital features should fit stated scholarly goals; editions should document methods, constraints, changes, accuracy, apparatus utility, and long-term functioning."],"publisher":"Modern Language Association of America","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"MLA Statement on the Scholarly Edition in the Digital Age","url":"https://www.mla.org/content/download/52050/1810116"},{"claims_supported":["TEI provides a structured critical-apparatus module with classified entries and multiple linkage methods.","An apparatus may be external to the base text, demonstrating established technical separation and modularity but not editorial scope control."],"publisher":"Text Encoding Initiative Consortium","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"OFFICIAL_STANDARD","title":"TEI P5 Guidelines, Version 2.4.0: Critical Apparatus","url":"https://tei-c.org/Vault/P5/2.4.0/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/TC.html"},{"claims_supported":["EditionCrafter is a first-party tool integrating primary sources, commentary, and textual analysis.","It publishes feature-rich static editions through established workflows intended to reduce maintenance cost and improve sustainability."],"publisher":"Making and Knowing Project and Performant Software Solutions","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","title":"EditionCrafter: A Simple Digital Edition Publication Tool","url":"https://editioncrafter.org/"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded public-web screen found adjacent standards, research, and products but no opened source containing the complete predecessor-constraint inventory, successor scope firewall, cumulative editorial complexity budget, staged thaw triggers, and pilot-fallback gate. Phrase or combination misses do not establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, or realized value; unindexed projects, books, archives, and patent literature may contain closer matches."}