{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Whole Building Design Guide post-occupancy evaluation","overlap":"Defines a building-specific evaluation using document review, physical inspection, performance metrics, separate interviews with occupants, operations staff, MEP/BAS consultants, project management, contractors, and the commissioning agent, followed by a standardized report substantiating underlying reasons and lessons learned.","remaining_difference":"It does not fix a retrofit savings estimand, separate a focal person from role-supplied authority and resources, or require qualified-actor substitution and structural-relaxation tests for deciding which causal mechanisms are transferable.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"Magenta Book process tracing and contribution analysis","overlap":"Provides single-case causal-mechanism testing, observable implications, consideration of alternative explanations and equifinality, assessment of other influencing factors, and explicit criteria for evidence supporting or opposing contribution claims.","remaining_difference":"It is domain-general evaluation guidance and does not specify an HVAC retrofit dossier integrating versioned controls, commissioning, operational evidence, person-position separation, substitute engineers, or design-standard governance.","source_ids":["SRC4"]},{"name":"Net-positive office commissioning and performance-gap case study","overlap":"Combines building energy-meter data with interviews about commissioning and operational decisions, identifies operator expertise and tools as consequential, and recognizes weather, design, equipment, communication, and continuing operation as influences on performance.","remaining_difference":"It estimates the effect of commissioning activities collectively and does not adjudicate a visible engineer's contribution against role, coalition, and structural alternatives or produce conditional design-rule transfer statements.","source_ids":["SRC3"]},{"name":"FEMP measurement and verification options","overlap":"Defines retrofit-isolation, system-level, whole-building, and simulation approaches using baseline and post-installation measurements and adjustments for weather, occupancy, load, and operations.","remaining_difference":"FEMP explicitly notes that whole-building verification cannot verify individual measures; the guidance does not attribute performance among people, roles, commissioning work, authority, and institutional conditions.","source_ids":["SRC1"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The contrastive claim is falsified for the bounded case if two authorized reviewers can complete the proposed evidence links and declare their counterfactual assumptions, yet the dossier identifies no additional conditional mechanism, contributor, person-position distinction, structural dependency, uncertainty, or transfer caveat beyond the existing M&V, commissioning, POE, and lessons-learned records, and it does not change which propositions reviewers judge sufficiently supported for later validation.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"For one completed office retrofit, adding explicit person-position separation, qualified-actor substitution, and bounded structural-relaxation probes to established M&V, POE, commissioning, and process-tracing practices will produce at least one reproducible conditional transfer finding or evidentiary caveat that those existing records do not supply. Whether any resulting design rule performs in another building remains outside this claim.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"The search covered the proposal directly, older and synonymous practices such as post-occupancy evaluation and Soft Landings, M&V and commissioning standards or practices, and combinations involving process tracing, contribution analysis, operators, actors, and structural conditions. Four opened sources span four publishers and include official guidance and primary research.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"The proposed test is limited to one frozen retrofit, two reviewers, archived read-only evidence, no more than eight voluntary interviews, comparison against existing records, and a stop before validation or standards adoption. The retained methods establish feasible inputs and comparison dimensions.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"Prior art supplies most ingredients separately, but no retained source combines building-level performance evidence with explicit person-versus-position analysis, qualified-actor substitution, structural relaxation, and conditional design-standard transfer. The claimed incremental output is observable and falsifiable.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"The authorized first step is analytical and read-only, preserves access restrictions and existing professional authority, and prohibits live controls or procurement changes. Separate role interviews and explicit method bounds are compatible with established evaluation practice; the stated halt conditions address foreseeable data and governance risks.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"FEMP distinguishes whole-building savings from individual-measure verification; the office case study shows commissioning, operator expertise, weather, design, and equipment can jointly affect performance; POE guidance separately solicits evidence from multiple project roles. These sources support the attribution gap even though none directly documents the proposal's specific hero-centered internal narrative.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","problem_evidence":{"finding":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED: Public sources show that measured building savings can aggregate interacting measures and changing conditions, while commissioning and operator decisions materially affect performance and established POE practice gathers evidence from multiple roles. The specific claim that organizations commonly standardize a visible engineer's sequence without this analysis was not directly established.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P076","screen_survival":true,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["building retrofit causal attribution process tracing actors commissioning operations energy performance","building controls retrofit actor substitution counterfactual engineer structural conditions","official contribution analysis process tracing alternative explanations causal mechanisms counterfactual actors guidance","causal process tracing individual contribution structural conditions sociotechnical systems evaluation"],"source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["office HVAC retrofit lessons learned controls engineer commissioning operator energy savings attribution","building retrofit causal attribution process tracing actors commissioning operations energy performance","building controls retrofit actor substitution counterfactual engineer structural conditions","organizational learning building retrofit transfer lessons learned commissioning design standards"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["HVAC retrofit measurement verification commissioning standard operator interactions design transfer","site:ashrae.org Guideline 14 measurement energy demand savings official","site:ashrae.org Standard 202 commissioning process buildings systems official","site:energy.gov FEMP measurement verification retrofit energy savings baseline adjustments"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["Soft Landings building performance lessons learned design team facilities management commissioning official","post occupancy evaluation building controls lessons learned operator commissioning design feedback official","building performance evaluation causal mechanisms actor network design team operators energy retrofit study","process tracing contribution analysis timeline alternative causal explanations official evaluation guide"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC4"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["M&V offers retrofit-isolation, system-level, whole-building, and calibrated-simulation approaches.","Whole-building verification adjusts for weather, occupancy, load, and operations but cannot verify individual measures.","Performance estimates depend on measurements and assumptions."],"publisher":"U.S. Department of Energy, Federal Energy Management Program","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Measurement and Verification Options for Federal Energy- and Water-Saving Projects","url":"https://www.energy.gov/cmei/femp/measurement-and-verification-options-federal-energy-and-water-saving-projects"},{"claims_supported":["POE evaluates HVAC, BAS, energy performance, documentation, and underlying reasons.","POE guidance calls for separate interviews with operations staff, MEP/BAS consultants, project management, contractors, and commissioning agents.","POE reports can substantiate lessons learned in a standardized form while respecting restricted areas and protocols."],"publisher":"Whole Building Design Guide, National Institute of Building Sciences","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Post Occupancy Evaluations","url":"https://legacy.wbdg.org/resources/post-occupancy-evaluations"},{"claims_supported":["An empirical office-building case combined energy-meter data with key-informant interviews about commissioning decisions.","The study found operator expertise, tools, commissioning choices, weather, design, equipment, and stakeholder collaboration relevant to performance.","The study estimated that primarily HVAC commissioning activities reduced annual building energy consumption by approximately 15%."],"publisher":"Elsevier, Energy and Buildings","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"Net-positive office commissioning and performance gap assessment: Empirical insights","url":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037877882200888X"},{"claims_supported":["Process tracing tests hypothesized causal mechanisms in a single case using predicted observable implications.","Contribution analysis assesses causal chains, other influencing factors, and relative contributions without claiming definitive proof.","Rigorous evaluation considers alternative explanations, equifinality, evidence for and against claims, and explicit falsification criteria."],"publisher":"UK Government, HM Treasury","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Magenta Book Annex A: Analytical methods for use within an evaluation","url":"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-magenta-book/magenta-book-annex-a-analytical-methods-for-use-within-an-evaluation-html"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded public-web screen found adjacent building-evaluation and causal-attribution practices but no opened source implementing the proposal's complete combination. It cannot establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, realized value, or absence of relevant proprietary, paywalled, unindexed, non-English, or unpublished practice."}