{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"ArchiveWeb.page with signed WACZ packaging","overlap":"ArchiveWeb.page already performs browser-local, interactive capture, stores archives in IndexedDB, records network traffic, and supports replay. Signed WACZ adds manifests, hashes, software/version and creation-time metadata, signatures, and validation procedures.","remaining_difference":"It does not establish the proposal's literature-specific semantic event model, consent filtering and reader-input separation, volatile-to-curated promotion workflow, replay-qualification decision, bounded trace eviction, or versioned classification of divergent literary states.","source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"]},{"name":"ELO Born-Again Bits preservation framework","overlap":"The framework identifies generated, interactive, networked, and stateful electronic literature as inadequately served by static preservation; proposes interpreters or emulators, structured metadata, saved states, references to reading trails, and marking sequential events for study and replay.","remaining_difference":"It is a preservation and migration framework rather than an implemented session-local recorder coupled to a separately governed witness archive with protected transfer triggers, dependency hashing, replay qualification, deduplication, and scheduled reconciliation.","source_ids":["SRC1"]},{"name":"Pathfinders Traversals","overlap":"Traversals documents performances of electronic literature on historically appropriate platforms through video, audio, author participation, and commentary, preserving evidence about works as computational constructs and their material circumstances.","remaining_difference":"Its audiovisual traversals are not structured event traces and do not inherently preserve executable dependencies, machine-reconstruct reader paths, validate replay, or promote qualified and divergent session witnesses through a two-store workflow.","source_ids":["SRC2"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The claim fails if, across matched reading paths, screenshots, ordinary recordings, or a static authorized package let an independent operator reconstruct and qualify the encountered textual state as accurately as the dual-store workflow while requiring less interruption and review; it also fails if event capture materially changes timing-sensitive behavior or replay qualification cannot distinguish capture faults from legitimate variability.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"For authorized variable literary works, a consent-bounded event store followed by curator-governed consolidation may preserve the relation among output, reader path, and execution environment more reconstructably than screenshots, audiovisual traversal recordings, static packages, or generic browser archives. The potentially distinct contribution is the combined literature-specific sequence model, protected transfer, permissions and input separation, dependency validation, explicit replay qualification, bounded retention, and non-destructive reconciliation of divergent witnesses.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"PASS: The bounded search covered direct problem/intervention language, historical terms such as electronic literature migration and traversals, first-party browser-archive products and specifications, and combinations involving state, trails, replay, environments, provenance, and hashes. All four retained sources were opened; they represent three publisher groups and include official guidance, primary scholarship, a first-party implementation, and a project specification. This is a coarse screen, not an exhaustive scholarly or patent search.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"PASS: One permission-controlled work, three predefined reading paths, matched screenshot and dual-store captures, one independent reconstruction operator, fixed process measures, and one delayed reconciliation run form a reversible and bounded pilot. The retained art supplies concrete comparators for static representation, recorded traversals, browser capture/replay, and integrity verification.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"PASS: The proposal makes a comparative claim measurable through reconstruction success, metadata completeness, replay agreement, interruption time, privacy exclusions, review effort, and divergence classification. Retained sources disclose many components but not the complete literature-specific, consent-governed two-store workflow.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"PASS: The authorized pilot is local, reversible, limited to public or permission-controlled material, requires reader consent, excludes credentials and unrelated activity, leaves authorized files unchanged, and has explicit quarantine and deletion rules. Permissions and licensing remain prerequisites. WACZ guidance also cautions that client-side archive authentication cannot prove what an origin server served, consistent with treating authorized files and environments—not reconstructed output—as authoritative.","source_ids":["SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"PASS: ELO identifies dynamic, generated, interactive, and stateful literature as poorly served by static preservation and calls for environment-aware interpretation, state and trail references, and sequential-event replay. Traversals reports loss of access caused by changing hardware, software, and platforms and preserves demonstrations on historically appropriate systems.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The broad preservation problem is visible: dynamic electronic literature depends on interaction and computational environments, and platform change can make works inaccessible. Existing scholarship and practice preserve source representations, emulated execution, recorded traversals, or high-fidelity web captures. The narrower assertion that ordinary screenshots or recordings routinely fail to retain the exact event sequence, configuration, and dependencies needed to reconstruct individual reader encounters was not directly quantified by the retained sources, so support is partial rather than complete.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P104","screen_survival":true,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["preserving electronic literature execution environment documentation replay reproducibility session path","digital preservation record replay environment provenance hashes version divergence","interactive fiction preservation playthrough event log replay archive"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3","SRC4"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["interactive electronic literature preservation session recording reader path replay archive generated text","\"electronic literature\" \"session\" preservation reader interaction trace","preserving electronic literature variable states replay-qualified witness archive"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["Webrecorder interactive web archiving high fidelity replay WARC browser sessions","WACZ specification data integrity pages manifest replay official Webrecorder","Pathfinders electronic literature traversals preservation performance recording"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["born-digital literature preservation variable states emulation replay documentation","cybertext traversal preservation reader path generated text archive","electronic literature migration interpreter saved state reading trail"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["Dynamic, interactive, networked, generated-text and game-like electronic literature is not adequately addressed by preservation approaches optimized for static works.","Preservation strategies include interpreters, emulators, structured representations, execution-environment preservation, saved states, reading trails, and sequential events marked for study and replay.","Complex computational works may require preserving their executable environment rather than a representation alone."],"publisher":"Electronic Literature Organization","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Born-Again Bits: A Framework for Migrating Electronic Literature","url":"https://www.eliterature.org/pad/bab.html"},{"claims_supported":["Changes in hardware, software, and platforms have made pioneering electronic-literature works inaccessible.","The Pathfinders project created audiovisual Traversals of demonstrations on historically appropriate platforms with authors' participation and commentary.","The research treats electronic works as both literary artifacts and computational constructs and attends to their material circumstances."],"publisher":"The MIT Press / Oxford Academic","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"Traversals: The Use of Preservation for Early Electronic Writing","url":"https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/30669"},{"claims_supported":["ArchiveWeb.page is a first-party browser extension and desktop application for interactive, high-fidelity web archiving.","It creates, stores, and replays archives held locally in browser IndexedDB.","It uses the Chrome debugging protocol to capture network traffic and integrates ReplayWeb.page technology."],"publisher":"Webrecorder","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","title":"ArchiveWeb.page: High-Fidelity Web Archiving Extension","url":"https://github.com/webrecorder/archiveweb.page"},{"claims_supported":["WACZ supports portable web archives and manifest-based hashes for packaged files.","The signing proposal records creation time, software and version information and defines verification of package, manifest, index, and record hashes.","The specification explicitly limits authenticity claims: it relies on the capturing client and cannot prove the origin server served particular content."],"publisher":"Webrecorder","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"OFFICIAL_STANDARD","title":"WACZ Signing and Verification 0.1.0","url":"https://specs.webrecorder.net/wacz-auth/0.1.0/"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded screen found adjacent art for electronic-literature state and trail representation, audiovisual traversals, browser-local capture and replay, and hashed archive packaging. It did not locate an opened source disclosing the full consent-bounded fast event store plus curator-promoted, replay-qualified literary witness archive with protected transfers, semantic input separation, bounded eviction, and versioned divergence reconciliation. That absence establishes neither world novelty nor patentability, market size, expert acceptance, or realized value; broader literature, archival-system, software-observability, and patent searches could reveal closer combinations."}