{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Engagement Ledger","overlap":"First-party consultation system that supports rapid logging of meetings and submissions, links people, topics, documents and commitments, provides status workflows, reminders, search, consent controls, confidential handling and attributable audit trails.","remaining_difference":"It describes one relational system of record, not a separately bounded and visibly nonauthoritative session store whose entries expire or undergo source verification, semantic separation, disclosure review, promotion or recorded exclusion, and reconciliation against an authority-controlled official participation corpus and response matrix.","source_ids":["SRC1"]},{"name":"Jambo stakeholder-management CRM","overlap":"Captures structured meeting and communication records, concerns and commitments; assigns owners and deadlines; restricts sensitive information; maintains change histories; and produces consultation-ready reports.","remaining_difference":"The public description does not establish source-segment locators, provisional status and expiry, transcription or translation validation, a governed transfer queue, separation of participant testimony from agency promises, or reconciliation between a temporary index and an independently authoritative record.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"EPA public-meeting record-and-follow-up practice","overlap":"EPA recommends a series of meetings, recording all input and comments, producing meeting summaries, accommodating interpretation needs, and telling participants what will happen to their input and what comes next.","remaining_difference":"The guidance does not prescribe the proposal's two-store lifecycle, item-level source provenance, validation and promotion rules, recorded exclusions, commitment ownership, eviction, version reconciliation, or fast-store authority markers.","source_ids":["SRC3"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The claim would be falsified if configuration evidence for an existing practice or product showed the complete two-store lifecycle—including provisional source-linked capture, consent and disclosure state, expiry, source and translation verification, semantic separation, controlled promotion or explicit exclusion, commitment ownership, and cross-store reconciliation—or if the bounded replay produced no reduction in unexplained source-to-record and commitment gaps while adding unresolved backlog or protection failures.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"For a completed three-to-five-session consultation, a separately bounded, nonauthoritative session index coupled through verification, disposition, eviction and reconciliation rules to the official participation corpus and response matrix will preserve more eligible oral contributions and cross-session commitments with reconstructable source links than ordinary notes, meeting summaries or single-store engagement systems, without increasing restricted-data exposure or materially merging distinct positions.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"The bounded search covered direct intervention language, consultation and records terminology, contemporary engagement products, official meeting and recordkeeping practice, historical terms such as responsiveness summary and commitment register, and combinations involving audit trails, consent, commitments, source records and response matrices. The retained sources span four publishers and include two first-party products and two official agencies.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"A read-only replay over three to five completed sessions and at most 200 releasable items is bounded and can measure source-link survival, gaps, merge errors, queue age, expiry and commitment disposition. It should use copies outside the official record, with the records officer determining whether simulated traces themselves require scheduling or retention.","source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"Existing products cover logging, search, commitments, permissions and audit history, while official guidance covers recording input and later follow-up. The still-distinct proposition is the measurable coupling of an expiring, nonauthoritative trace store to a separately authoritative corpus and response matrix through validation, promotion, exclusion and reconciliation.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"The proposed first step is retrospective, read-only and excludes participant contact and official-record changes. No categorical stop is visible, but NARA guidance means circulated or relied-upon working traces can themselves be records; the records/privacy authority must therefore approve the simulation environment, access, retention and disposal before execution.","source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"EPA treats series of meetings, complete input capture, summaries, interpretation and follow-up expectations as operational needs. The two product publishers identify scattered notes, missing records and forgotten commitments as consultation-management problems, while NARA shows that working files used for follow-up can carry formal recordkeeping consequences. Evidence is credible but does not include an independent audit of the exact multi-session coupling failure.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The problem is visible at a coarse level: public meetings can form a series requiring recorded input and continuing follow-up; commercial consultation systems are explicitly designed to replace scattered interaction records and memory-based commitment tracking; and working files used for agency action or follow-up may acquire record status. The retained evidence does not directly quantify omissions between oral session material and final official records, so support is partial.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P119","screen_survival":true,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["stakeholder engagement software field notes approval workflow official record commitment audit trail consent source document","public consultation software moderation workflow draft validated published submissions audit trail","community engagement commitment tracking audit trail consultation software","consultation management response matrix commitments public participation software"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC4"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["public consultation multi-session unresolved questions commitments tracking official record oral comments transcript response matrix","consultation engagement management system oral submissions recordings response commitments tracking","public participation record source provenance transcription translation consent official response matrix","meeting working notes provisional official record records management public consultation"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["stakeholder engagement software field notes approval workflow official record commitment audit trail consent source document","site:epa.gov public participation guide oral comments transcript response to comments record","site:archives.gov working files records preliminary notes follow-up official business","community engagement commitment tracking audit trail consultation software"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["public involvement responsiveness summary oral comments commitments","community consultation issues log action register meeting follow-up","stakeholder engagement commitment register consultation historical practice","public hearing transcript response to comments tracking commitments older terminology"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["Consultation work can be fragmented across notebooks, inboxes and spreadsheets, with commitments tracked from memory.","The product links communications, events, topics, documents and commitments; offers rapid entry and search; tracks deadlines; and provides audit, confidentiality and consent controls.","Its public architecture is presented as one relational system of record rather than the proposed two-store official-record coupling."],"publisher":"Engagement Ledger","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","title":"Stakeholder Engagement Software | Engagement Ledger","url":"https://engagementledger.com/"},{"claims_supported":["The product structures meetings, calls and other communications and links them to concerns and commitments.","It supports ownership, deadlines, restricted access, audit histories, search and consultation reporting.","The public feature description does not specify a provisional-to-official validation, expiry and reconciliation lifecycle."],"publisher":"Jambo","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","title":"Stakeholder management CRM built for engagement","url":"https://www.jambo.cloud/jambo-crm-stakeholder-management"},{"claims_supported":["Public participation may use a series of meetings rather than one event.","EPA recommends recording all input and comments, producing and distributing a clear summary, and explaining what will happen to participant input.","Meeting design may require interpreters and accessibility arrangements."],"publisher":"United States Environmental Protection Agency","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Public Participation Guide: Public Meetings","url":"https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/public-participation-guide-public-meetings"},{"claims_supported":["Working files used or circulated for agency follow-up, action or official communication may be federal records.","A working copy can differ from a recordkeeping copy, but record status depends on use and purpose rather than merely being labeled provisional.","Source and input records, working drafts, system content, outputs and disposition require governed treatment."],"publisher":"National Archives and Records Administration","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Records Basics","url":"https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/scheduling/basics"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded public-web screen found adjacent practices and products but cannot establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, realized value, or the absence of unpublished, proprietary or differently described implementations."}