{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Ahrens-style Zettelkasten workflow","overlap":"Separates quickly captured fleeting notes from permanent notes, transforms selected material into durable self-contained records, uses source-reference infrastructure, and discards fleeting notes after a short processing window. It also recognizes that revising permanent notes can erase context, mistakes, and dead ends.","remaining_difference":"It does not specify a collaborative close-reading dossier with editor-controlled promotion, verified quotations and locators, claim-evidence-counterreading records, explicit dissent preservation, authority labels, or reconciliation after edition and attribution conflicts.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"Zotero PDF Reader and Note Editor","overlap":"Supports low-friction passage annotation followed by selective or bulk transfer into notes, automatically retaining citations and links back to PDF pages and allowing later inspection in source context.","remaining_difference":"Transfer is user-directed retention rather than mandatory validation and promotion into an authoritative dossier; the documented workflow lacks provisional-versus-validated authority states, expiration, dissent handling, and conflict-triggered reopening.","source_ids":["SRC3"]},{"name":"Hypothesis pre-moderation workflow","overlap":"Implements contributor and moderator roles, visible Pending/Approved/Declined states, a review queue, re-review after edits, and protection against decisions based on a stale loaded version.","remaining_difference":"It governs visibility of individual annotations rather than transformation into a separate integrated claim-evidence dossier, and it does not provide bounded trace expiration, literary-evidence verification, deduplication, counterreading preservation, or dossier reconciliation.","source_ids":["SRC4"]},{"name":"Marshall and Brush personal-to-public annotation study","overlap":"Empirically examines movement from private reading annotations to shared discussion records. Among more than 1,700 annotations, only a small fraction related directly to shared comments, text-anchored margin notes were more likely to contribute, and shared annotations underwent substantial changes in content and anchoring.","remaining_difference":"The study motivates transformation between registers but does not implement an authoritative, versioned literary dossier or prescribe promotion, eviction, integrity-checking, and reconciliation rules.","source_ids":["SRC1"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The remaining claim fails if a single-document, retention-only, or lightweight Zettelkasten/Zotero-style control performs equivalently or better on recovery of high-priority observations, verified passage support, preservation of disagreements, stale-note use, delayed retrieval, review time, and backlog—or if participants cannot reliably distinguish provisional traces from promoted records.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"In collaborative close reading, the potentially distinct claim is that adding editor-governed locator verification, observation-inference separation, dissent preservation, explicit authority states, bounded expiration, and conflict-triggered reconciliation to an established fleeting-to-permanent-note pattern improves evidentiary integrity without imposing disproportionate capture or review costs.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"The bounded search covered direct close-reading language, personal/public and fleeting/permanent-note terminology, current annotation and note products, moderation practices, standards terminology, and combinations involving provenance, versioning, and review. Four opened sources span four publishers and include primary research plus first-party documentation.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"A one-text, one-session comparison with a delayed retrieval task is reversible and can measure capture latency, locator verification, promoted-claim support, preserved disagreements, stale use, review effort, and backlog. Existing research and products demonstrate that annotation transformation, source-linked notes, and moderator queues are observable operations.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"Although the fast-to-durable architecture substantially overlaps established practice, the added package of literary evidence validation, visible authority, dissent preservation, and later reconciliation yields a specific comparative claim with predefined failure outcomes.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"The authorized pilot is limited to a public-domain text and local templates, preserves contributor control over provisional traces, reserves promotion decisions for a designated editor, excludes grading and publication uses, and supplies explicit halt and rollback conditions. Human moderation and visible review states are operationally plausible.","source_ids":["SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"The primary study directly shows that reading annotations and later shared contributions differ sharply and that text anchoring affects transfer. Zettelkasten and Zotero practices also encode a practical need to convert rapid reading traces into durable, source-linked notes. Evidence does not directly establish the proposal's claimed frequency of lost or hardened interpretations among literary scholars, so support is partial.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"SUBSTANTIAL_COLLISION","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The transition problem is visible: personal reading annotations are selectively and substantially transformed for later sharing, while established scholarly-note workflows distinguish fleeting capture from durable records and current software explicitly transfers annotations into source-linked notes. The stronger claims about routine loss, unsupported canonization, and edition-conflict accumulation in literary seminars were not directly demonstrated by the retained sources.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P129","screen_survival":false,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["scholarly annotation close reading tool provenance version history interpretation dossier","annotation moderation workflow provisional approved scholarly annotations","site:dl.acm.org annotation lifecycle informal formal notes reading scholarly annotations research"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3","SRC4"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":"No retained source described the complete ledger-to-dossier package for collaborative literary close reading; this phrase-level miss was not treated as novelty evidence.","queries":["close reading annotation provisional observations validated claims dossier workflow literary scholars","literary annotation system close reading passage notes provenance interpretation research"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["Zotero annotations add to note citation backlinks official","digital humanities annotation platform close reading CATMA provenance versioning","W3C Web Annotation Data Model provenance states selectors official","annotation moderation workflow provisional approved scholarly annotations"],"source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["Zettelkasten fleeting notes literature notes permanent notes process source citation official","Niklas Luhmann slip box fleeting notes permanent notes literature notes scholarly writing workflow","Catherine Marshall annotation ecology personal digital libraries active reading marginalia paper"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["A study compared students' personal annotations made while reading assigned papers with annotations shared through an online discussion system.","Across more than 1,700 annotations, only a small fraction of personal annotations directly related to shared discussion annotations.","Text anchors coupled with margin notes were more likely to underlie public commentary, and annotations changed substantially in content and source anchoring when shared."],"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery, page hosted by Microsoft Research","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"Exploring the Relationship between Personal and Public Annotations","url":"https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/exploring-the-relationship-between-personal-and-public-annotations/"},{"claims_supported":["The described Zettelkasten workflow moves from fleeting notes through revision into literature notes or durable Zettels.","Fleeting notes support rapid capture during reading, lectures, or seminars and are expected to be rewritten and discarded within a day or two.","Permanent notes are self-contained and durable; the source warns that revision can lose context and obliterate the history of mistakes and dead ends."],"publisher":"Zettelkasten Method","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"TRADE_PROFESSIONAL","title":"From Fleeting Notes to Project Notes – Concepts of \"How to Take Smart Notes\" by Sönke Ahrens","url":"https://zettelkasten.de/posts/concepts-sohnke-ahrens-explained/"},{"claims_supported":["Zotero provides rapid PDF highlighting and annotation.","Users can selectively or collectively add annotations to notes.","Transferred annotations automatically include citations and links to PDF pages and can be reopened in source context."],"publisher":"Zotero / Corporation for Digital Scholarship","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","title":"Zotero PDF Reader and Note Editor","url":"https://www.zotero.org/support/pdf_reader?rev=1778004321"},{"claims_supported":["Hypothesis pre-moderation labels new group annotations Pending until a moderator approves or declines them.","It assigns owner/moderator authority and provides a moderation queue with explicit statuses.","Editing a non-spam annotation returns it to Pending, and moderators are warned when their loaded version is stale before changing status."],"publisher":"Hypothesis (Annotation Unlimited, PBC)","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","title":"Pre-moderation in the Hypothesis Web App","url":"https://web.hypothes.is/help/pre-moderation-in-the-hypothesis-web-app/"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This four-source public-web screen found substantial collision between the proposal's core fast-to-durable architecture and established Zettelkasten practice, with adjacent source-linking and approval-state mechanisms in Zotero and Hypothesis. It did not find one source implementing the entire literary governance package. The bounded search cannot establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, or realized value."}