{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"FAA test-log, discrepancy-report, and problem-tracking workflow","overlap":"Requires test-time logs and structured discrepancy records containing identifiers, affected requirements, test step, configuration and system state, timestamps, supporting data, originator, resolution, regular review, documented disposition, escalation to problem reports, verification, and archival.","remaining_difference":"It does not specify a separate append-only, visibly provisional delta store with risk-triggered PLM consolidation, bounded active retention, or bidirectional baseline-version reconciliation.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"DOE startup-test temporary-change log and restoration controls","overlap":"Uses a temporary-change log and startup punch list to capture test modifications, preserve the intended configuration, require concurrent verification, and ensure restoration after testing.","remaining_difference":"It is a procedural temporary-modification practice rather than the proposed evidence-normalizing, two-store digital promotion pipeline with explicit uncertainty preservation and backlog eviction.","source_ids":["SRC3"]},{"name":"PTC WIP-to-release PLM synchronization and promotion practice","overlap":"Explicitly discusses separate work-in-process and release-management processes, synchronization timing, promotion to controlled maturity states, version traceability, redline freshness, access controls, and reconciliation of upstream and downstream structures.","remaining_difference":"It does not disclose the complete test-cell-specific bundle of append-only rapid capture, safety-triggered routing, end-of-shift consolidation, uncertainty-preserving transformation, and expiring active-ledger views.","source_ids":["SRC4"]},{"name":"Controlled-redline failure lesson in test/configuration management","overlap":"Documents a consequential case where an informal engineering redline was not incorporated into the final specification, an incompatible design entered a released baseline, and the error escaped ground testing.","remaining_difference":"It establishes the failure mode and need for formal interface control but does not prescribe the proposal's complete ledger-to-baseline mechanism.","source_ids":["SRC1"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The contrastive claim is falsified if the selected organization's existing test-log, discrepancy-report, temporary-change, or PLM workflow already provides test-pace structured capture with raw evidence and uncertainty, unmistakable provisional status, controlled human promotion, version-conflict reconciliation, equivalent access controls, and timely retirement of working records—or if the replay shows no improvement over that workflow on trace loss, stale-state use, backlog, or authority ambiguity.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"The remaining testable distinction is the integration of known controls into one test-cell-specific mechanism: an append-only provisional ledger, immediate risk routing plus shift-close consolidation, uncertainty- and provenance-preserving transformation, visible non-authority markers, bounded working retention, and reconciliation against the released baseline. Its operational advantage over established discrepancy, temporary-change, and PLM practices remains unproven.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"Four lanes covered direct wording, historical terms such as redline and temporary modification, official test/configuration practices, PLM products, and component combinations. Exactly four opened sources from four publishers were retained, including official guidance and a first-party PLM source.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"The proposed two-hour historical replay is finite, read-only, reversible, and measures capture latency, provenance loss, routing, conflicts, backlog, and disposition. FAA discrepancy reviews and DOE concurrent verification provide practicable comparison patterns.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"Although the component practices substantially overlap prior art, the claimed integrated bundle and its asserted advantage over existing workflows can be falsified by a controlled replay using specified records and conflict cases.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"An isolated shadow replay with no equipment or canonical-system writes presents no obvious stop if access controls, non-authoritative labeling, named reviewers, and halt conditions are enforced. Official practices support formal review, verification, and controlled disposition.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"A documented aerospace failure shows an informal redline lost before baseline incorporation, while the PTC source identifies scattered information, outdated redlines, WIP/release synchronization difficulty, and error-prone manual aggregation. The sources do not establish frequency or magnitude in the selected test cell.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"SUBSTANTIAL_COLLISION","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The problem is visible: informal or scattered change traces can fail to reach the released baseline, become outdated, or require difficult manual synchronization. Evidence supports the failure mode but not its prevalence, severity, or specific test-pace latency in the target organization.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC4"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P147","screen_survival":false,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["test cell engineering change log configuration baseline reconciliation prototype testing","work-in-process release management synchronization PLM redline promotion","temporary change log test modification restoration concurrent verification"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["prototype test observations configuration management PLM change control test log provisional engineering changes","informal engineering redline not incorporated final baseline test failure"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC4"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["FAA test evaluation handbook discrepancy report configuration state supporting records","DOE startup testing temporary change log configuration restoration","PTC PLM WIP release management synchronize promote redline traceability"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["as-tested configuration test log engineering change control","temporary modification test configuration control engineering log","test discrepancy report configuration management prototype test","redline test article configuration change control engineering"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["An informal redline was not incorporated into the final mission specification.","The resulting incompatible harness entered a released baseline and escaped ground-test detection.","The guide recommends testing the flown configuration and formally controlling system interfaces."],"publisher":"The Aerospace Corporation","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"TRADE_PROFESSIONAL","title":"The Test Like You Fly Process Guide for Space, Launch, and Ground Systems","url":"https://aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/TOR-2014-02537-REV%20A%20-%20The%20Test%20Like%20You%20Fly%20Process%20Guide%20for%20Space%2C%20Launch%2C%20and%20Ground%20Systems.pdf"},{"claims_supported":["Formal testing maintains logs and generates discrepancy reports for encountered issues.","Discrepancy records include requirements, test step, configuration and state, timestamps, supporting evidence, originator, and resolution.","A database tracks discrepancies through review, documented disposition, corrective-action escalation, verification, closure, and archival."],"publisher":"Federal Aviation Administration","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Test & Evaluation Handbook","url":"https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/TEHandbook.pdf"},{"claims_supported":["Startup testing used temporary-change logs and punch lists to capture test-support modifications.","The temporary-change process required restoration of the original configuration and concurrent verification by a second test engineer.","The punch list captured modifications requiring restoration after testing."],"publisher":"U.S. Department of Energy","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"Construction Quality and Startup Assessment at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant","url":"https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2019/03/f60/Construction%20Quality%20and%20Startup%20Assessment%20at%20Hanford%20WTP-March%202019.pdf"},{"claims_supported":["Separate WIP and release-management processes create a synchronization-timing problem in dynamic development.","PLM maturity controls can promote information to controlled collaboration states while preserving traceability.","Scattered information and manual aggregation create mistakes; redlines can become outdated, and related structures require reconciliation and consistent access controls."],"publisher":"PTC","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","title":"Your Digital Transformation Starts with BOM Management","url":"https://www.ptc.com/en/resources/plm/white-paper/digital-transformation-starts-with-bom-management"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded public-web screen found substantial overlap among established test discrepancy databases, temporary-change logs, controlled redlines, and WIP/release PLM synchronization. It cannot establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, implementation feasibility, or realized value, and it does not show that every element has previously appeared in one implementation."}