{"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Second System Complexity Restraint","overlap":"Near-element-for-element collision: predecessor-constraint memory, separated parity/safety/debt/improvement classes, a successor core contract, constraint-function replacement, feature-admission criteria, complexity budgets, staged release tiers, launchability reviews, and migration or rollback considerations.","remaining_difference":"The proposal instantiates the published pattern in a solar agricultural cold-room controller, selects brownout resilience and defrost-fault logging, specifies particular countable budgets, and proposes a half-day audit; these are contextual parameters rather than a distinct intervention architecture.","source_ids":["SRC1"]},{"name":"The Second-System Effect","overlap":"Brooks describes a successful first system followed by an overembellished successor containing previously deferred ideas, and recommends disciplined cost feedback and architectural budgeting.","remaining_difference":"It does not provide the proposal's explicit predecessor constraint-function inventory, work-class firewall, staged ambition ladder, or cold-room application.","source_ids":["SRC2"]},{"name":"Optyma Control cold-room controller range","overlap":"A first-party cold-room product range combines simple commissioning with selectable defrost methods, protection, parameterization, system-manager integration, and cloud monitoring, showing that the candidate feature dimensions coexist in commercial controller portfolios.","remaining_difference":"It does not document a v1-to-v2 backlog, combinatorial verification failure, or the proposed successor-scope governance method.","source_ids":["SRC3"]},{"name":"WHO E001 cold-room and solar-power guidance","overlap":"Official guidance makes commissioning, voltage protection, competent installation, verification, service capability, training, maintenance, and continuity explicit and states that solar cold-room configurations can be comparatively complex and hazardous.","remaining_difference":"It addresses procurement, installation, verification, and lifecycle safety rather than preventing deferred ambitions from flooding a successor-controller release.","source_ids":["SRC4"]}],"contrastive_claim_falsifier":"For the remaining domain-specific implementation hypothesis, use two blinded reviewers on the same capped backlog: it is falsified if the proposed artifacts and rubric do not yield stable, auditable admit-or-park decisions, or if parking discretionary ambitions fails to reduce configuration, verification, commissioning, and support burden without excluding mandatory safety or compliance obligations.","contrastive_claim_remaining":"Only a domain-specific implementation claim remains: applying the already-published Second System Complexity Restraint pattern to this controller backlog, with the stated brownout/defrost launch tier and measurable caps, will improve triage consistency and reduce launch burden. The broader claimed distinctiveness of anchoring successor governance to predecessor constraint functions, separated work classes, a core contract, and a legitimate later path does not remain contrastive because SRC1 already discloses that combination.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"rationale":"The bounded search covered the proposal directly, the historical second-system/feature-creep vocabulary, cold-room products and official guidance, and exact combinations of the named mechanisms. Four opened or directly retrieved sources span four publishers and include first-party and official material.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"bounded_next_test":{"rationale":"A read-only, half-day review of at most 30 requirements can produce the proposed inventory, labels, core contract, and burden matrix without committing to redesign. Reviewer agreement and before/after burden counts give bounded decision criteria.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"distinct_testable_claim":{"rationale":"The application can be tested, but the asserted contrastive mechanism is not distinct: SRC1 already combines predecessor constraint-function recovery, separated work classes, a successor core contract, complexity budgeting, staged release, launchability review, and a deferred-ambition path.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"],"status":"FAIL"},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"rationale":"The authorized first step is document-only, preserves existing change authority and interlocks, and has explicit halt conditions. WHO guidance reinforces that qualified electrical authority, commissioning, voltage protection, verification, and service continuity must remain mandatory rather than become discretionary scope.","source_ids":["SRC4"],"status":"PASS"},"supported_problem":{"rationale":"The general successor-overreach mechanism is directly documented, commercial controllers expose several of the relevant feature dimensions, and official guidance confirms that solar cold-room configuration, commissioning, verification, electrical protection, and servicing are consequential. Public sources do not verify that this particular team's stated v2 backlog exists, so support is for the problem class rather than the confidential instance.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PASS"}},"prior_art_disposition":"SUBSTANTIAL_COLLISION","problem_evidence":{"finding":"The problem class is visible: second systems can absorb deferred embellishments; cold-room controller offerings span simple commissioning through adaptive defrost and cloud integration; and official solar cold-room guidance identifies configuration complexity, voltage hazards, commissioning, verification, training, and long-term service obligations. The specific v1 success, postponed-request stockpile, and combined v2 backlog remain uncorroborated by public evidence.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED"},"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_light_screen_20260806","schema_version":1,"screen_id":"E13P178","screen_survival":false,"search_lanes":{"component_combination":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["\"constraint-release inventory\" successor product","\"rewrite scope firewall\"","\"complexity budget review\" successor charter","\"parity-then-expansion gate\""],"source_ids":["SRC1"]},"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["successor product redesign feature creep predecessor constraints scope firewall complexity budget requirements","\"Second-System Complexity Restraint\" \"Constraint-Release Inventory\"","\"V2 Feature-Flood Control\"","\"Architectural Grandiosity Brake\""],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]},"products_practices_and_standards":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["solar powered cold room controller multi zone refrigerant telemetry standards commissioning","solar cold room controller defrost brownout remote monitoring product","site:who.int solar power system cold freezer rooms type examination protocol controller","site:iec.ch refrigeration controller functional safety standard defrost control"],"source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"]},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"no_result_note":null,"queries":["\"second-system effect\" product successor feature creep requirements","Fred Brooks second system effect how does architect avoid functional ornamentation budget each feature","The Mythical Man Month second-system effect PDF architect budget","site:acm.org \"second-system effect\" Brooks"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]}},"sources":[{"claims_supported":["Discloses the same successor-overreach problem after a constrained first success.","Prescribes predecessor constraint memory, separated work classes, a successor core contract, constraint replacement, admission triage, complexity budgets, staged releases, launchability reviews, and a deferred-ambition path.","Names closely matching mechanisms including Constraint-Release Inventory, Rewrite Scope Firewall, Feature Admission Rubric, Complexity Budget Review, Parity-Then-Expansion Gate, Staged Release Ladder, and Successor Charter."],"publisher":"The Encyclopedia of Abstractions (Abstractopedia)","source_id":"SRC1","source_type":"OTHER","title":"Second System Complexity Restraint","url":"https://abstractopedia.org/archetypes/second_system_complexity_restraint/"},{"claims_supported":["Provides the historical second-system-effect formulation.","Frames the successor risk as accumulated embellishment after the first system and discusses disciplined architectural budgeting and builder feedback."],"publisher":"Addison-Wesley Professional via O'Reilly","source_id":"SRC2","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","title":"The Mythical Man-Month, Chapter 5: The Second-System Effect","url":"https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/mythical-man-month-the/0201835959/ch05.xhtml"},{"claims_supported":["Shows a commercial single-phase cold-room controller range from standalone to managed solutions.","Lists fast commissioning, multiple and adaptive defrost methods, protection, parameter programming, system-manager connectivity, and cloud monitoring."],"publisher":"Danfoss","source_id":"SRC3","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","title":"Optyma Control: Cold room controllers for single-phase cooling systems","url":"https://www.danfoss.com/en-in/products/dcs/electronic-controls/electronic-temperature-control/optyma-control-ak-rc-101103/"},{"claims_supported":["States that cold rooms must be commissioned by competent installers and monitored and maintained.","Identifies voltage fluctuation risks and protection practices for refrigeration and electronic monitoring equipment.","States that compliant solar cold-room configurations are comparatively complex, involve potentially lethal voltages, and require careful design, verification, qualified installation, servicing, training, and lifecycle planning."],"publisher":"World Health Organization","source_id":"SRC4","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","title":"E001: Cold Rooms, Freezer Rooms and Related Equipment","url":"https://extranet.who.int/prequal/immunization-devices/e001-cold-rooms-freezer-rooms-and-related-equipment"}],"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded public-web screen found a substantial conceptual collision and therefore does not support novelty of the intervention architecture. It does not establish publication priority, world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, realized value, or whether the proposal's organization-specific facts are true."}