{"actors":["Youth strength-program director responsible for the successor program","Lead strength and conditioning coach who owns exercise progression and session design","Assistant coaches who deliver instruction and supervise technique","Safeguarding lead and sports-medicine advisor responsible for participation boundaries and referral rules","Youth athletes participating in the program","Parents or guardians responsible for consent and scheduling"],"affected_objective":"Preserve a coachable, understandable, and safely supervised youth strength-progression pathway while correcting selected continuity and progression gaps without overloading sessions, staff attention, or participant learning.","arm":"ORDINARY_DIVERSE_P2","authority_safety":{"authorized_first_step":"The program director may convene a tabletop review of existing session plans, attendance records, coach notes, equipment lists, and proposed successor modules; this review does not alter participant eligibility, exercises, loads, schedules, or medical decisions.","decision_authority":"The program director approves release scope; the lead strength coach owns the core contract and session-complexity ledger; the safeguarding lead retains veto authority over supervision and participant-protection requirements; the sports-medicine advisor retains authority over medical exclusions, referral criteria, and return-to-participation decisions.","excluded_actions":["Changing any athlete's exercises, training load, progression, or eligibility during the planning review","Treating a curriculum admission decision as medical clearance or individualized clinical advice","Reducing required supervision, safeguarding, consent, or emergency provisions to meet the complexity budget","Introducing high-skill or high-load exercises without the program's established coaching and readiness requirements","Collecting new participant data or conducting experimental testing without applicable consent and oversight","Cancelling the existing program before the successor passes defined continuity checks"],"halt_rollback":"Halt module admission or successor rollout if supervision ratios cannot be maintained, prerequisite skills become unclear, required safety procedures are displaced, session plans exceed available instructional time, coaches cannot apply progression rules consistently, or participants lose a usable continuity path. Return to the predecessor session template for appropriately cleared participants and reopen only the failed module or progression lane."},"baseline":"Continue assembling the successor academy by combining the predecessor's foundational sessions with requested speed, plyometric, weightlifting, conditioning, mobility, testing, sport-specific, and individualized-periodization modules, resolving conflicts within individual session plans without a predecessor-constraint record, protected core progression, aggregate instructional-load budget, or staged admission boundary.","candidate_id":"second_system_complexity_restraint__sport_science__ORDINARY_DIVERSE_P2","causal_chain":["A small introductory youth strength program operates under fixed twice-weekly sessions, a short exercise menu, simple progression rules, limited equipment, small groups, and repeated coaching cues.","Authorization of a longer successor academy relaxes those limits and creates an entry point for training modules, personalization requests, testing practices, and sport-specific tracks previously left outside the introductory program.","Because foundational continuity, safety obligations, progression repair, supported additions, and aspirational modules share one program-design process, each requested element can be framed as necessary for a complete successor.","The accumulated modules compete for session minutes, coach observation, equipment, prerequisite teaching, participant recovery, and explanation time.","Exercise exposure becomes fragmented, progression rules acquire exceptions, and coaches must supervise more simultaneous learning demands before the successor has demonstrated a deliverable core sequence.","A predecessor constraint inventory distinguishes limitations that merely restricted variety from limits that protected repetition, instructional clarity, supervision, and scheduling.","A successor core contract and module-scope firewall protect the foundational movement and progression sequence while assigning safety, repair, current improvement, and speculative modules different admission rules.","A complexity budget makes cumulative demands on session time, coach attention, equipment transitions, prerequisites, recovery, and participant learning visible before modules enter the launch tier.","A staged release ladder parks additional modules behind observable participation, coaching-capacity, prerequisite, and scheduling triggers rather than embedding them in the initial academy.","Launchability reviews using complete sample weeks and a reversible continuity pathway allow the bounded successor to proceed only while coaches can teach, supervise, progress, and support it under actual program conditions."],"cell_id":"second_system_complexity_restraint__sport_science","consequence":"The successor curriculum can become too dense to teach and supervise as a coherent progression, producing crowded sessions, inconsistent coaching rules, weak exercise continuity, scheduling strain, and an indefinite transition away from the simpler operating program.","diversity_from_prior_proposals":"This opportunity concerns the post-success expansion of a coached youth strength curriculum into overloaded session architecture. Its affected objective is coachable motor-skill and strength progression, its intervention governs training-module admission and finite session resources, and its causal path runs through instructional density, prerequisite competition, and progression incoherence rather than athlete-data integration or monitoring-system migration.","experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp13_second_slot_policy60_20260806","intervention":"Create a successor charter for the youth strength academy. Reconstruct how the predecessor's fixed schedule, exercise limit, equipment boundary, group size, and repeated cues constrained variety while protecting repetition, supervision, comprehension, and delivery. Define a launch-tier core contract consisting of the foundational movement sequence, explicit progression and regression rules, required safeguarding practices, and only named repairs to attendance continuity and coach handoff. Separate foundational continuity, safety obligations, progression defects, coach-development debt, supported improvements, speculative modules, and parked ambitions. Require each proposed module to identify the participant objective, prerequisites, evidence needed for local adoption, session minutes, coach-attention demand, equipment transitions, recovery interactions, maintenance burden, and release-tier fit. Cap total launch-tier complexity across simultaneous exercise stations, new skills per block, progression branches, equipment changes, testing events, coach qualifications, and unresolved safety dependencies. Place non-core modules in stabilization, expansion, or later-review tiers with owners and observable admission triggers. Review complete sample weeks for teachability, supervision, scheduling, and continuity before accepting additions, and retain the predecessor template as a reversible delivery path.","mechanism_mapping":[{"counterfactual_removal":"Without it, the fixed schedule, narrow exercise menu, repeated cues, and small groups are remembered only as limitations, so their roles in repetition, supervision, and instructional clarity disappear without replacement controls.","mechanism_slug":"constraint_release_inventory","role":"Recovers predecessor constraint memory and identifies which focusing functions must be retained or deliberately replaced."},{"counterfactual_removal":"Without it, a complete foundational progression has no protected status relative to sport-specific tracks, advanced lifts, testing, or personalization ambitions.","mechanism_slug":"successor_charter","role":"Defines the successor's core participant pathway, selected current-cycle repairs, safety invariants, tier boundaries, and decision owners."},{"counterfactual_removal":"Without it, optional modules and coach-development wishes can be relabeled as foundational continuity or safety requirements.","mechanism_slug":"rewrite_scope_firewall","role":"Separates work classes and assigns distinct admission standards to continuity, safety, repair, supported improvement, and speculation."},{"counterfactual_removal":"Without it, modules that appear manageable individually can collectively exceed session time, coach attention, equipment, learning, and recovery capacity.","mechanism_slug":"complexity_budget_review","role":"Caps cumulative instructional and operational burden across the complete launch-tier program."},{"counterfactual_removal":"Without it, deferred modules either crowd the initial academy or lose a credible route to later consideration.","mechanism_slug":"staged_release_ladder","role":"Provides stabilization, expansion, and later-review tiers with named owners and observable triggers."},{"counterfactual_removal":"Without it, individual modules may pass review even though a complete training week cannot be taught, supervised, scheduled, or progressed coherently.","mechanism_slug":"parity_then_expansion_gate","role":"Requires delivery of the protected foundational sequence under actual constraints before optional capability expansion."}],"nearest_rivals":["Ordinary session-plan simplification, which can shorten crowded sessions but does not govern ambition released by a successful predecessor program.","Youth resistance-training safety review, which addresses exercise and supervision hazards but does not separate successor continuity from accumulated curriculum ambitions.","Periodization redesign, which reorganizes training variables but need not recover predecessor constraint functions or create legitimate deferred-release tiers.","Coach-capacity planning, which estimates staffing and qualifications but does not protect a successor core contract from module flooding.","Minimum viable curriculum design, which favors a smaller program but does not necessarily preserve continuity with a functioning predecessor or manage its postponed ambitions."],"negative_tests":{"intervention_falsifier":"In a tabletop construction of representative training weeks, the constraint inventory, work-class firewall, admission rubric, and aggregate budget produce no stable difference from baseline module selection, reveal no cumulative conflict missed by ordinary session planning, or cannot protect the core sequence without excluding mandatory safeguarding or documented current participation requirements.","problem_falsifier":"The diagnosis is rejected if there is no functioning constrained predecessor, no material stockpile of postponed modules entering its successor, or the proposed breadth follows from documented current program obligations already separated into feasible tiers with adequate coaches, time, prerequisites, and continuity arrangements.","risks":["The core contract could preserve a curriculum element that later review finds unsuitable for current participants.","Complexity scoring could imply false equivalence among session time, technical skill, supervision, and recovery demands.","Preferred modules could be relabeled as safety or foundational requirements to bypass admission rules.","A fixed budget could underrepresent meaningful differences among age, training history, or accessibility needs.","Parked modules could become indefinite deferrals if triggers have no owner or review date.","Maintaining the predecessor template during transition could divide coach preparation and equipment time."],"strongest_counterevidence":"The strongest counterevidence would be complete sample-week plans showing that the broader module set is required by current participant objectives, has explicit prerequisites and qualified supervision, fits available session and recovery capacity, preserves a coherent progression, and is easier to deliver as an integrated academy than through staged modules."},"next_evidence_step":"Run one two-hour tabletop workshop with the program director, lead coach, one assistant coach, safeguarding lead, and sports-medicine advisor. Review no more than 12 existing session plans and 15 proposed additions, reconstruct up to seven predecessor constraints, classify each addition, draft a launch-tier progression, and test two representative weeks against session-time, supervision, prerequisite, equipment, and recovery budgets. Record unresolved classifications, attempted gate bypasses, and failed continuity conditions in a decision memo only; authorize no participant-facing change.","observable_state":"Draft academy materials combine foundational squat, hinge, push, pull, brace, and landing progressions with Olympic-lift instruction, sprint mechanics, plyometrics, aerobic and anaerobic conditioning, mobility blocks, testing days, sport-specific tracks, individualized branches, and competition preparation. Sample sessions contain multiple simultaneous stations and equipment transitions, while module prerequisites, progression ownership, coach-attention limits, launch-tier boundaries, and criteria for retaining the predecessor template are not consistently recorded.","prior_art_status":"UNSEARCHED","problem":"A youth strength program's first instructional cycle produced a usable coaching routine under tight boundaries: two sessions per week, a small exercise menu, repeated movement teaching, limited equipment, simple group-wide progressions, and close supervision. Its omissions generated requests for speed work, plyometrics, weightlifting, conditioning, mobility, testing, individualized periodization, and sport-specific tracks. After the introductory program secured support for a longer academy, the old limits were treated solely as deficiencies and the successor became the intended home for nearly every postponed module. Foundational continuity, safety requirements, progression repairs, coach-development needs, and aspirational training options are therefore being combined before a teachable core sequence and deliverable weekly structure are fixed.","proposal_index":2,"remaining_contrastive_claim":"The proposal depends on a temporal sequence in which a constrained coached program establishes an operable routine, accumulates excluded training ambitions, and then loses its focusing boundaries when a successor academy is authorized. Without that predecessor-generated ambition release, the issue is better described as ordinary curriculum design, session planning, or coaching-capacity management.","revision_record":{"claim_changes":["Initial version; no novelty, prevalence, demand, or effect-size claim is made."],"conceptual_changes":["Initial version maps second-system complexity restraint to the successor of a constrained youth strength-training curriculum."],"evidence_changes":["No external or prior-art evidence was consulted; problem and intervention falsifiers are specified."],"operational_changes":["The first step is limited to a tabletop review of existing materials and produces no participant-facing training change."],"parent_version":null,"progress_targets_addressed":["Independent sport-science problem centered on coached curriculum delivery","Concrete predecessor constraints and postponed-ambition stockpile","Protected core progression and differentiated work classes","Multidimensional session-complexity budget and staged release ladder","Explicit authority, exclusions, halt conditions, and reversible continuity path","Bounded evidence step and negative tests"]},"schema_version":1,"structural_mapping":[{"archetype_element":"Constrained first success","domain_realization":"A twice-weekly introductory youth strength program establishes an operable routine through a small exercise menu, repeated cues, simple progression, limited equipment, and close supervision."},{"archetype_element":"Predecessor constraint memory","domain_realization":"The design team records how schedule, exercise, equipment, group-size, and progression limits both restricted variety and protected repetition, coach attention, comprehension, and delivery."},{"archetype_element":"Deferred ambition backlog","domain_realization":"Speed, plyometric, weightlifting, conditioning, mobility, testing, individualized, and sport-specific modules remain visible without automatically entering the academy's launch tier."},{"archetype_element":"Successor core contract","domain_realization":"The launch tier preserves the foundational movement sequence, explicit progression and regression rules, safeguarding requirements, and named continuity or coach-handoff repairs."},{"archetype_element":"Preserved constraint function map","domain_realization":"Released limits receive replacements such as station caps, prerequisite gates, coach-to-station rules, module sequencing, or qualification requirements; useful limits remain until defined triggers are met."},{"archetype_element":"Ambition triage gate","domain_realization":"Each module must identify its participant objective, prerequisites, required support, session cost, coach-attention demand, equipment transitions, recovery interaction, and release-tier fit."},{"archetype_element":"Complexity and scope budget","domain_realization":"The launch program caps simultaneous stations, new skills per block, progression branches, equipment changes, testing events, required coach qualifications, and unresolved safety dependencies."},{"archetype_element":"Staged successor release ladder","domain_realization":"Foundational continuity belongs to launch; selected additions follow stabilization; advanced and sport-specific modules await named participation, capacity, prerequisite, or scheduling triggers."},{"archetype_element":"Launchability gate","domain_realization":"Complete representative weeks are reviewed for teachability, supervision, progression coherence, equipment feasibility, scheduling, recovery interaction, and staff support before scope is admitted."},{"archetype_element":"Rollback or escape path","domain_realization":"The predecessor session template remains available for appropriately cleared participants if the successor cannot meet supervision, prerequisite, time, or continuity conditions."}],"title":"Session-Architecture Gate for a Youth Strength-Program Successor","version":0}