{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E13Q022","reason":"B retains the actor-versus-structure attribution logic but makes the substitutions and structural relaxations directly observable through crossed physical conditions; A is strong but remains a more inferential retrospective dossier.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q054","reason":"A is an especially faithful abductive workflow: fixed observations, live rivals, pre-registered discriminators, action limits, and revision conditions. B creates potentially useful evidence, but the witness laminate’s temporal and spatial fidelity is a substantial additional dependency.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":4,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":4},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q025","reason":"Both faithfully govern a persistent stock, but B provides a distinct, directly measurable physical-capacity application with an explicit distributed reserve and displacement check. A is well formed yet closer to P1’s repository staging-control shape.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q034","reason":"A is a clear stock-flow diagnostic and admission application, but uncertain boundary-wide thermal-energy estimation limits its practicality. B adds a materially distinct buffering lever while preserving reconciliation, capacity reserve, lag, and coupled-stock checks.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q031","reason":"A is a strong information-fidelity monitoring loop. B is equally faithful and adds a genuinely distinct conservation setting with calibrated noncontact signals, uncertainty controls, and authority-bounded response pathways.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q024","reason":"A is rigorous but closely repeats P1’s engineering evidence-promotion gate. B preserves the multiplicity-to-confirmation structure while supplying a more distinct physical separation of discovery and fresh confirmation material.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"}]}