{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E13Q026","reason":"Both preserve the successor-constraint sequence, but B makes parity, optional expansion, finite complexity, staged admission, and rollback independently operable through the lane itself. Its physical form is causally necessary to decouple the core test rather than merely decorative.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q021","reason":"A is a strong, directly faithful attribution application, but remains close to P1's organizational-record analysis. B adds stage-local physical evidence and bounded actor/structure contrasts, making attribution less dependent on focal documentation while retaining uncertainty and responsibility limits.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q038","reason":"A faithfully instantiates predictive correction but is closely adjacent to P1's administrative-rule gate. B supplies an independently valuable physical preview, explicit tolerances, reversible pre-corrections, commitment gating, and post-construction calibration; its mock-up is integral to observing the relevant consequences.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q057","reason":"A is a thoughtful stock-flow application, though its counting scheme risks some imposed commensurability and stays near the literary-analysis setting of P1. B identifies a literal persistent stock, reconciles inflows and residuals, uses direct levers on accumulation, and checks displacement, giving the portfolio a distinct and testable conservation application.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q014","reason":"A is a high-quality abductive reception-history workflow with clear rivals and probes. B adds new, reproducible observations that can actually discriminate material-history rivals while preserving a provisional tie state and strict limits on editorial claims; this is substantially more complementary to P1's passage-level docket.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q037","reason":"A is a strong continuous-model alternative to phase bins and explicitly protects against smoothing across interruptions. B more fully realizes the parent’s hybrid requirement: discrete contacts, continuous within-contact dynamics, resolution validation, and an objective comparison against count-based representations. The instrumentation is necessary to preserve the force-time structure at issue.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"}]}