{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E13Q029","reason":"B more fully realizes mixed, property-specific continuity and rupture across physiological, social, and service transitions, with strong agency and transfer safeguards; A is precise and testable but its chamber findings have narrower ecological validity.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q052","reason":"B provides a direct, governed fast-capture to durable-witness architecture for a real literary preservation problem. A is impressively specified, but the loop-to-film apparatus is needlessly burdensome and adds avoidable degradation relative to available durable capture approaches.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":5,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":1,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q003","reason":"A supplies a genuinely distinct physical fast-to-slow preservation problem relative to P1 and makes transfer, stabilization, ordering, and integrity checks explicit. Its representativeness risks lower practicality, but B largely repeats P1’s scratchpad-to-ledger pattern.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":4,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":2,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":2,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q050","reason":"B is the stronger early-warning loop: its stable reference article, configuration binding, trend rules, and response pathway directly address end-to-end evidence drift with good feasibility. A is sound but witness representativeness is a central unresolved limitation.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q006","reason":"B is a coherent, practical multiplicity discipline for multi-endpoint research, including registered families, interim looks, analytic flexibility, status labels, and independent replication. A has useful tamper-evident controls but is operationally forced and overly restrictive for routine screening.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":4,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":2,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q039","reason":"A creates a bounded crossed design that can actually separate occupant, room, and interaction mechanisms while retaining strong authority boundaries. Its mock-setting limitation is explicit; B is excellent analysis but remains less directly testable and overlaps P1 more closely.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":3},"winner":"A"}]}