{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E13Q023","reason":"B directly governs the full search-to-rulemaking evidence path; A is inventive but physically overconstrains ordinary inspections and adds substantial deployment burden.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":5,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":2,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q002","reason":"Both implement genuine precommitment correction, but B offers a more practical, calibrated, and readily testable release gate; A has material representativeness and transfer risks.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":5,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q048","reason":"A cleanly preserves a valid field-level indicator while detecting and repairing materially persistent local tails. B fits the pattern but its compatibility interpretation is less decisive and operationally heavier.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q036","reason":"A makes the event substrate and replayable stage views central to a consequential temporal-state problem. B is a narrow and mechanically elaborate recorder, not a comparably complete event-centered representation architecture.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":5,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":2,"structural_fidelity":3,"testability":4},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q019","reason":"A directly distinguishes stable cohort shares from individual trajectory flow and tightly bounds claims by level. B is thoughtful but depends on a technically demanding physical-measurement apparatus and looser equilibrium framing.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":4,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":2,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":4},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q027","reason":"A is a direct fast-working-state to validated archival-record coupling with explicit routing, promotion, expiry, and reconciliation. B is plausible but treats a sensor witness as a fast store more metaphorically and adds conservation complexity.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":5},"winner":"A"}]}