{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E13Q026","reason":"A preserves the successor-after-constraint-release structure while translating capacity limits into teachability and supervision checks. B is imaginative and testable, but its physical modularization only partly resolves dependencies among the proposed measurements and is less practical.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q001","reason":"Both proposals fit strongly. B more directly makes the discrete-versus-continuous choice empirically discriminable through calibrated spatial measurements, repeated transects, and a conservative boundary rule; its instrumentation burden is the main drawback.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q011","reason":"A supplies a distinct, physically measurable stock-flow case with lawful clearance friction as a real lever and robust hidden-reservoir checks. B is excellent but overlaps substantially with P1’s legal-adjudication backlog frame.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q046","reason":"B cleanly preserves a valid aggregate posture while testing comparable micro-level discretion under explicit safeguards. A is well specified, but stable average sound level is a weaker macro proxy for intelligibility and the material retrofit may not address non-acoustic comprehension failures.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q052","reason":"B is a natural fast-capture/slow-witness architecture for variable digital literature, with meaningful transfer, replay, authority, and reconciliation rules. A has complete mapping but relies on costly, obsolete media whose degradation and burden are not justified over a calibrated durable recorder.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":5,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":1,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q009","reason":"A uses nondestructive measurement to create genuinely discriminating evidence for a defeasible rival-history comparison, giving the portfolio a distinct evidentiary application. B is highly polished but closely repeats P1’s action-limited municipal explanation-ledger form.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"A"}]}