{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E13Q038","reason":"B retains the full precommitment-prediction structure but uses a direct, calibratable physical preview with clear adjustment variables and completion checks; it also adds more distinct portfolio coverage than another high-stakes governance gate.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q050","reason":"Both are strong deterioration-monitoring implementations, but B has a cleaner end-to-end condition signature, robust configuration controls, and a more readily repeatable validation path. A's representative-witness assumption is useful but materially harder to establish.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q014","reason":"B preserves defeasible abductive comparison while obtaining genuinely new, reproducible material evidence. It complements P1's textual-attribution protocol more strongly than A's similarly documentary explanatory workflow.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q034","reason":"A is a faithful but closely analogous ledger application. B applies the stock-flow frame to a physical buffering and clearance intervention, with explicit coupled-stock checks, giving materially greater incremental portfolio value despite harder engineering integration.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q025","reason":"A is sound but duplicates P1's information-stock ledger form in a closely related setting. B makes a locally distributed physical capacity stock directly measurable and protected, with an unusually clear displacement check and action path.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":2,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q042","reason":"A translates regime diagnosis into differentiated, mechanism-facing preservation action with bounded physical probes, explicit hysteresis testing, and strong legacy safeguards. B is well designed but remains closer to P1's institutional transition workflow and has weaker causal identification from historical replay.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"A"}]}