{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E13Q030","reason":"B is the stronger companion within literary production: it preserves genuinely contested translation judgment while making future cross-work consequences actionable before lock. A is carefully bounded, but surrogate-to-unique-witness transfer makes its predictive layer less practical and less reliable.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q055","reason":"A is a polished application of the same pre-session forecasting pattern already represented by P1. B adds a distinct, mechanically adjustable commitment point and retains calibration; its short-bout-to-long-duration inference is the main limitation.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q039","reason":"A supplies an unusually direct crossed test of person, position, distributed work, and material conditions—the central attribution tension—rather than another primarily documentary attribution docket. Its mock-setting validity limits practicality, but it adds more to P1’s portfolio.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q007","reason":"B offers boundary-specific physical signatures that sharply discriminate equipment explanations while explicitly preserving field-only rivals. A is also sound, but is closer to P1’s athlete-performance explanatory workflow and depends more on behaviorally imperfect practice simulations.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q053","reason":"B realizes stock–flow control through an actual finite thermal stock, measured inflows/outflows, and a capacity-limited physical clearance lever. Its medical and measurement burden is substantial, but it contributes more than A’s closely related ledger of practice records.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q029","reason":"A makes threshold and return-path diagnosis experimentally meaningful through verified reversible oxygen transitions and strict clinical gates. B is humane and well-specified, but its broad, slow social mechanisms are less readily discriminated and overlap more with P1’s reintegration-transition framing.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":2,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":3},"winner":"A"}]}