{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E13Q041","reason":"A supplies a sharply specified, independently testable condition-monitoring loop for a distinct preservation risk; B is sound but broader and less diagnostic.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":4,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q020","reason":"B cleanly separates immediate orientation from durable confirmatory evidence and adds a materially different legal-use case; A is excellent but substantially overlaps P1's provisional-to-canonical workflow.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":2,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q059","reason":"B is a direct, governable application of event-centered modeling to identity decisions. A has interesting evidence capture, but its threshold witnesses risk forced discretization and add substantial compatibility burden.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":3,"contrivance_risk":4,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":2,"structural_fidelity":3,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q017","reason":"B more practicably preserves the second-system structure through explicit core competencies, burden limits, staged expansion, and reversible transition. A is rigorous but its bespoke hardware gating is a less practical response.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":5,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q036","reason":"B offers a complementary event source for otherwise lost transient loads, with explicit bounded-event, ordering, completeness, and validation semantics. Its mechanism is complex, but the test plan makes the key assumptions falsifiable.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":4,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q057","reason":"B is a particularly clear stock-flow intervention: a measurable cumulative stock, explicit un-cleared inflows, material-specific bands, and levers that directly reduce accumulation. It also diversifies P1's interpretive focus.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"}]}