{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E13Q005","reason":"A more clearly exposes the step/flow tradeoff in a distinct allocation setting; B is also strong but is closer to P1’s preservation-monitoring terrain.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q058","reason":"B provides a direct, credible multiplicity-control workflow for iterative ranking evaluation. A preserves the structure but relies on an unusually elaborate physical cassette and comparator scheme.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":5,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":2,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q047","reason":"A makes regime diagnosis materially decision-changing through exposure-path, threshold, and retained-damage evidence. B is well designed but risks adding a broad documentation layer to conventional qualification without changing gates.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q040","reason":"B has a well-bounded physical forecast, adjustable precommitment actions, and a direct surrogate validation path. A’s carrier-risk forecasting is less securely identifiable from the proposed historical evidence.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q019","reason":"A directly tests whether stable cohort shares conceal changing reader trajectories and links the result to appropriately scoped interpretation. B is inventive but its specialized imaging apparatus is comparatively overbuilt for the claimed interpretive boundary.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":4,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q049","reason":"B is a practical, complete two-store architecture with explicit authority, transfer, expiry, and reconciliation. A maps the pattern cleverly but depends on a highly specialized mechanical recording and embossing assembly.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":5,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":2,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":5,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"}]}