{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E13Q002","reason":"A retains the upstream-preview, adjustment, gate, and calibration structure while adding a materially different physical analogue to P1's digital lift model. Its scale-transfer risk is explicit and testable. B is highly sound but is another computational pre-release propagation system, yielding less portfolio separation.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q033","reason":"A is a faithful and practical scope-firewall application, but closely repeats P1's document-and-budget governance form. B makes predecessor constraints and cumulative ambition burdens operationally visible through measured vehicle margins, with a credible bounded expansion path; the physical form is causally necessary rather than decorative.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q013","reason":"B directly governs a genuine many-candidate search and sensibly separates resemblance from intentional-allusion claims. A is inventive but its surrogate-control distribution is unlikely to represent singular manuscript degradation, and the apparatus can undercount informal or downstream analytic looks, making the claimed false-reading control forced.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":3,"contrivance_risk":5,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":2,"structural_fidelity":4,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":4,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q015","reason":"A is a strong direct analogue of P1 but offers limited incremental portfolio value. B preserves the predecessor-constraint, core-contract, hard-budget, staged-expansion, and escape-path logic while translating it into genuine physical dependency isolation that can be tested before migration.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":4,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":2,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"winner":"B"},{"pair_id":"E13Q010","reason":"A is a high-fidelity application where incompatible environmental regimes and shared-plant coupling make physical cells, capacity limits, and capped interfaces causally apt. B is workable but substantially duplicates P1's scope-governance and reversible-migration structure.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":1,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"A"},{"pair_id":"E13Q008","reason":"A tests person, position, crew coupling, and mechanical constraint through direct force-motion evidence and bounded substitutions, making it a substantively different complement to P1's retrospective review. B is coherent but largely repeats P1's reconstruction-based attribution form in a closely related sports setting.","scores_a":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":3,"incremental_portfolio_value":5,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":3,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":5},"scores_b":{"causal_coherence":5,"contrivance_risk":2,"incremental_portfolio_value":3,"operational_specificity":5,"practicality":4,"structural_fidelity":5,"testability":4},"winner":"A"}]}