{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E14A005__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Wildfire mutual-aid operations","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes operational failures and existing coordination arrangements without proposing changes, interventions, or an archetype.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The command dashboard lags field conditions, and a small dispatch team cannot approve every repositioning quickly enough."},{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Numerous recurring staging, routing, and refill decisions combine to determine coverage, congestion, and gaps."},{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Incident-wide coverage depends primarily on standing handoff, boundary, queue, and check-in arrangements rather than isolated effort or a detailed command-issued action list."},{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Crews know immediate hazards and access conditions but cannot see the complete incident state."}],"scenario_text":"During a fast-moving wildfire, mutual-aid engines are spread across several divisions while wind shifts, road closures, and water availability change by the minute. The command dashboard often trails field conditions by twenty minutes, and four dispatchers cannot approve every repositioning, refill trip, or staging choice before circumstances change. Crews therefore make recurring decisions using what they can see in their own sectors.\n\nThose decisions accumulate. Several engines may converge on the same accessible hydrant while another division loses coverage, or units may leave a sector uncovered after assuming a neighboring crew has accepted a handoff. Standing practices for sector boundaries, refill queues, radio acknowledgment, and mutual-aid check-in strongly determine whether the incident maintains balanced coverage. A single crew’s judgment rarely causes the overall failure; thousands of locally reasonable choices produce bunching, delay, or gaps when the practices governing their interactions fit poorly. Each crew knows nearby fire behavior, passable roads, and equipment status, but no crew has enough current information to optimize deployment across the entire incident.","scenario_title":"Wildfire Resources Bunch Around Stale Information","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses wildfire-specific language such as engines, hydrants, divisions, staging, and fire behavior; it does not use archetype names, theoretical labels, or supplied predicate wording."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E14A005__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Cooperative irrigation network","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports allocation failures and existing practices without suggesting revised rules, technology, governance, or any other remedy.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Canal-office readings are delayed, and two coordinators cannot direct every gate adjustment across the network."},{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Repeated gate and pumping choices collectively determine tail-end delivery, overflow, and fairness."},{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Reliable distribution depends on recurring rotation, turn-yielding, and low-flow practices rather than goodwill or individualized central instructions."},{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Growers observe nearby soil, weather, and ditch conditions but lack current network-wide visibility."}],"scenario_text":"A grower-owned irrigation cooperative serves sixty farms through branching earthen canals. Water takes hours to travel from the headworks to the tail reaches, and seepage varies with soil, weather, and recent maintenance. The canal office receives meter readings only twice daily. Its two coordinators cannot direct every farm’s gate adjustments as crop needs and channel conditions change throughout the day.\n\nGrowers repeatedly decide when to open a turnout, how much to draw, whether to yield a turn, and when to stop pumping. Individually modest choices combine into serious effects: simultaneous upstream withdrawals can leave tail-end orchards dry, while overly cautious withdrawals can send unused water past the service area. Reliable and reasonably even delivery depends largely on the cooperative’s recurring rotation, turn-yielding, and low-flow practices, not on any grower’s goodwill or a farm-by-farm action list from the office. Each grower can judge local soil moisture, crop stress, and the water visible in a nearby ditch, but none can see current demand, travel time, and losses throughout the entire canal network.","scenario_title":"Local Withdrawals Destabilize a Shared Canal","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The agricultural setting and vocabulary—turnouts, headworks, seepage, soil moisture, and orchards—are substantially separated from the emergency-response surface language of the direct case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E14A005__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Centrally scheduled irrigation transfer system","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b039_a04_c3","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement identifies a structural mismatch but offers no recommendation, corrective design, or named solution.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Telemetry reaches the control room late, and central approval cannot keep pace with changing field conditions."},{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Many recurring farm-level timing and pumping choices aggregate into consequential pressure and loss patterns."},{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c3","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"The required allocation and safe operating state are explicitly produced by a single centrally calculated gate-and-pump sequence, while local interaction practices are prohibited from determining them."},{"condition_id":"b039_a04_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Operators possess useful station-level observations but lack sufficient system-wide state to calculate a safe sequence independently."}],"scenario_text":"A regional irrigation authority moves scarce water through one pressurized transfer main to sixty farm stations. Field operators repeatedly adjust on-farm pumping times and temporary storage, and their combined choices materially affect pressure swings, evaporation losses, and how much water remains available late in the day. They can see crop stress, tank levels, leaks, and pressure at their own stations, but they cannot observe the full main, other farms’ withdrawals, or reservoir constraints.\n\nTelemetry arrives at the control room with substantial delay, so the central schedule may be based on conditions that have already changed. Approval of deviations can take hours during peak demand. Nevertheless, the legally required allocation and safe pressure sequence are produced exclusively by a hydraulic engineer’s centrally calculated daily gate-and-pump list. Operators are forbidden to substitute turn-taking customs, neighbor agreements, or other standing interaction practices for that sequence. Thus, although recurring local choices collectively create important losses and disturbances, the intended system-wide allocation does not arise from the way operators interact; it is specified by a single central action plan.","scenario_title":"Delayed Telemetry Undermines a Mandatory Pumping Sequence","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer case’s irrigation complexity while distinguishing a pressurized, centrally sequenced system from the cooperative canal. It avoids archetype terminology and verbatim predicates."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp14_applicability_retrieval40_20260813","sample_id":"E14A005","schema_version":1}