{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E14A007__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"specialty food manufacturing","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports sourcing volumes and operational exposure without proposing supplier changes, inventory policies, qualification work, or any other corrective action.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b021_a05_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The plant purchases the critical enzyme from six approved vendors and places recurring orders with four."},{"condition_id":"b021_a05_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Two vendors supply 81% of annual volume, including 63% from one vendor."}],"scenario_text":"A regional producer of lactose-free dairy products buys the processing enzyme used across its entire product line from six approved vendors. Four receive recurring purchase orders, while the remaining two are used for occasional specialty batches. Procurement reports that the supplier list has grown steadily and that every vendor has passed the company’s food-safety and purity reviews. Yet last year’s receipts show that one vendor delivered 63 percent of all enzyme volume and a second delivered another 18 percent. Those two firms also hold the standing allocations used for weekly production, so routine scheduling depends primarily on their confirmed shipments. The other four vendors collectively supplied 19 percent, divided among small lots and infrequent orders. A delay at the largest vendor recently forced planners to revise production dates for several high-volume products, even though none of the plant’s own equipment, quality controls, or staffing systems had failed. Management is reviewing why a roster of six approved sources still leaves most output tied to two commercial relationships.","scenario_title":"Six Approved Enzyme Vendors, Two Dominant Sources","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses concrete manufacturing language—enzyme receipts, approved vendors, standing allocations, and production dates—without naming the archetype or reproducing either selected predicate."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E14A007__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"municipal emergency communications","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement presents message traffic, authorization patterns, and consequences of an outage without recommending new channels, governance changes, or technical measures.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b021_a05_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The city distributes alerts through seven distinct public communication outlets."},{"condition_id":"b021_a05_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Text alerts and the local television partner account for 84% of resident reach, with the remaining five outlets contributing 16%."}],"scenario_text":"A coastal city issues evacuation and severe-weather notices through seven public outlets: text alerts, a local television partner, two radio stations, the municipal website, a transit display network, and verified social-media accounts. Residents often describe the arrangement as broad because the same warning can appear in several places within minutes. Audience records from the last four emergencies tell a less balanced story. Text alerts reached 58 percent of residents who received an official warning, and the television partner accounted for another 26 percent. The other five outlets together contributed 16 percent, mostly through overlapping or small audiences. Department logs also show that senior officials routinely approve wording first for text and television; releases to the remaining outlets often follow later. During a recent telecommunications outage, the city website, radio stations, transit displays, and social accounts remained available, but calls to the emergency information line surged because many residents had not encountered the notice. The communications office is documenting how seven visible outlets translate into actual public reach and official attention.","scenario_title":"Seven Alert Outlets with Uneven Public Reach","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Shifts from physical sourcing to civic warning dissemination and uses audience reach, official attention, alerts, and media outlets rather than manufacturing or supplier terminology."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b021_a05_c4","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"The outlets are explicitly operated through separate organizations, facilities, transmission systems, and service areas, so the scenario denies a common upstream geography or other shared operating base."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b021_a05_c5","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"Drills show each outlet can independently publish the complete notice within the required window and handle the full expected audience."}],"case_id":"E14A007__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"municipal emergency communications","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b021_a05_c3","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes measured reach, independence, and tested capability only; it offers no recommendation, redesign, or intervention.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b021_a05_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The city continues to use seven distinct outlets for emergency notices."},{"condition_id":"b021_a05_c3","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"Measured reach is nearly even at 12–16% per outlet, and no pair exceeds 31%, explicitly ruling out dominance by a narrow group."}],"scenario_text":"A coastal city issues evacuation and severe-weather notices through seven public outlets: text alerts, a local television partner, two radio stations, the municipal website, a transit display network, and verified social-media accounts. After four emergencies, independently deduplicated audience records show that each outlet supplied between 12 and 16 percent of first encounters with an official warning. No single outlet exceeded 16 percent, and no pair accounted for more than 31 percent. Approval logs likewise show that wording is released to all seven within the same five-minute interval, with no outlet receiving privileged access to officials. The services are run by separate organizations using different facilities, transmission systems, and service areas; investigators found no common operating base behind them. Quarterly drills further show that every outlet can publish the complete notice within the required window and serve the full expected audience on its own. Following a recent storm, the communications office is examining whether maintaining seven outlets creates unnecessary administrative complexity, despite the measured reach remaining broadly even across them.","scenario_title":"Evenly Reached Residents Across Seven Alert Outlets","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer domain’s civic-warning vocabulary and operational detail while using explicit measurements to negate only the selected-route dominance condition; separate evidence addresses the alternative routes."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp14_applicability_retrieval40_20260813","sample_id":"E14A007","schema_version":1}