{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b006_a10_c3","condition_set_id":"B1","how_blocked":"Sensor-to-command latency is measured in seconds, the setpoint is fixed, and the chamber state has not moved elsewhere before action begins."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b006_a10_c5","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"Temperature and compressor-state logs continuously capture the effect of every command, so recurrence is not due to absent effect monitoring."}],"case_id":"E14A027__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Frozen-food warehouse refrigeration","intended_route_id":"B2","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports operating behavior, timing, and observations without proposing equipment, tuning changes, procedures, or other interventions.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b006_a10_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Chamber temperature repeatedly leaves its specified band even though sensors, controllers, and three working compressors are present."},{"condition_id":"b006_a10_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Compressor staging drives temperature below the band, followed by shutdown and a rise above it, with undercooling and overcooling repeating."},{"condition_id":"HR1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Logs tie the chamber-temperature departures directly to compressor commands issued from that temperature reading."}],"scenario_text":"A regional grocery distributor’s frozen-food chamber must remain between −20°C and −18°C. Its calibrated probes report every five seconds, and the installed controller can start any of three recently serviced compressors. Nevertheless, the chamber repeatedly reaches −16°C and then falls to −24°C, especially after routine door openings. A small warming often starts all three compressors; their fixed minimum run time keeps them operating after the reading crosses back into range. When they finally stop, the cold inventory continues absorbing heat, after which warm incoming pallets carry the reading upward again. At other times, only one unit starts and the warming continues until the controller calls all three.\n\nTrend records show that commands follow probe readings within seconds and that the temperature reference remains fixed throughout each episode. The same records continuously pair chamber temperature with compressor state, including the measured result of every start and stop. Technicians have found no missed readings, command queue, or unrelated heat event that explains the recurring high-low cycle.","scenario_title":"Frozen Chamber Swings Across Its Temperature Band","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses concrete refrigeration language—chamber, probes, compressors, pallets, run time, and temperature records—without naming the archetype or reproducing any supplied predicate."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b006_a10_c3","condition_set_id":"B1","how_blocked":"Reviewer transfers take effect within one minute and begin before the age limit is crossed; the target does not move during an episode."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b006_a10_c5","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"The dashboard attributes and reviews the measured impact of each staffing move, so the repeated deviation is not caused by unobserved outcomes."}],"case_id":"E14A027__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Livestream safety-review operations","intended_route_id":"B2","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement contains no recommendation about staffing increments, scheduling, routing, automation, or management practice.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b006_a10_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The oldest pending report repeatedly falls outside its 8–12 minute operating band despite active reassignment authority and available reviewers."},{"condition_id":"b006_a10_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Large staffing moves rapidly empty the queue and are then reversed, causing alternating surpluses and shortages while report age swings low and high."},{"condition_id":"HR1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Each staffing change is triggered by and measured against the same pending-report age displayed for the livestream queue."}],"scenario_text":"A livestream platform expects the oldest unreviewed safety report to remain between eight and twelve minutes. The operations lead can move trained reviewers among queues immediately, and an always-on dashboard refreshes report age every few seconds. Yet the oldest-report figure repeatedly climbs past twenty minutes and later drops below two minutes during otherwise ordinary evening traffic.\n\nWhen the displayed age begins rising, the lead transfers reviewers in blocks of thirty. The move takes effect within a minute, before the twelve-minute boundary is crossed, but the enlarged crew soon clears nearly everything. Reviewers are then returned to other work; the remaining crew proves too small, and age rises sharply again. On some cycles, a cautious transfer barely changes the climb, prompting a much larger move at the next reading. The reference band does not change during these episodes.\n\nThe staffing console records every transfer and attributes the subsequent change in report age to it. Weekly reviews confirm the repeated pattern is confined to this same livestream-report queue, rather than reflecting delayed data or movement among different targets.","scenario_title":"Livestream Review Queue Alternates Between Flood and Drought","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Shifts to digital trust-and-safety operations and uses queue age, reviewers, transfers, traffic, and dashboards, substantially separated from the refrigeration vocabulary of the direct case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"HR1","condition_set_id":"B1","how_blocked":"The appeal-age departures and the alternating staffing corrections belong to independently operated queues with no shared trigger, personnel, or workload."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"HR1","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"The two observed patterns are explicitly shown not to form one departure-and-correction relationship, so the shared relational requirement fails regardless of monitoring."}],"case_id":"E14A027__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Online media appeals and copyright-review operations","intended_route_id":"B2","omitted_condition_id":"HR1","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement only distinguishes two observed operational patterns and reports audit findings; it proposes no remedy or intervention.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b006_a10_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The reinstatement-appeal age repeatedly exceeds its stated band despite available appeal reviewers and reassignment controls."},{"condition_id":"b006_a10_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Copyright-screening staffing moves alternate between excessive and insufficient reallocations, repeatedly emptying and rebuilding that queue."},{"condition_id":"HR1","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"An audit establishes that the appeal-age departure and the copyright staffing responses concern separate queues, staffs, inputs, and triggers and do not affect one another."}],"scenario_text":"An online media company’s operations dashboard places two volatile charts side by side. The first shows the age of the oldest reinstatement appeal, which is expected to stay between eight and twelve minutes but repeatedly exceeds twenty minutes despite an available appeal roster and functioning reassignment controls. The second shows staffing changes for automated-copyright referrals. Supervisors repeatedly move large groups into that work, empty its queue, pull them back, and then send them in again when referrals accumulate. Smaller moves sometimes accomplish little, followed by excessive ones.\n\nAt first, managers assumed the staffing swings explained the appeal-age spikes because both patterns were most visible on busy evenings. A workflow audit explicitly ruled that out. Reinstatement appeals and copyright referrals enter separate systems, use different reviewer pools, and have independent supervisors. Copyright staffing moves are initiated only by copyright volume and neither draw from nor add capacity to the appeal roster. Timestamp analysis also found no effect of those moves on appeal age in either direction. The dashboard had merely juxtaposed a recurring out-of-range measure with an alternating response occurring elsewhere.","scenario_title":"Adjacent Dashboard Charts Mask Two Independent Problems","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer case’s operational complexity and media-platform setting while changing the focal work types and explicitly separating appeal aging from copyright staffing; no archetype or predicate wording appears."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp14_applicability_retrieval40_20260813","sample_id":"E14A027","schema_version":1}