{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E14A038__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Disposable endoscopic imaging-probe manufacturing","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports symptoms, measurements, and operational consequences without proposing corrective action.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_pair_specific_arbitrary_placement_calibration_a01","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Loose seating and individually varying optical and electronic characteristics cause a reference conversion to produce different errors for every assembled probe."}],"scenario_text":"A manufacturer builds disposable endoscopic imaging probes from a miniature camera, an LED ring, and a molded distal housing. The retaining features allow each camera to seat at a slightly different depth and rotation, while LED output and sensor response also vary across lots. Inspection software converts pixel position and brightness into estimated feature size and tissue reflectance using coefficients established on a reference probe. Production trials show that the same test target is reported differently by every assembled probe: edge locations drift, apparent dimensions change, and brightness errors reverse direction between units. The discrepancies remain stable within a given probe but do not follow a predictable lot-wide pattern. A coefficient set recorded from one finished probe often worsens the readings when associated with another, even when both passed component-level inspection. The company cannot rely on one conversion for the installed camera–illuminator combination without exceeding its stated measurement tolerance.","scenario_title":"Endoscope Probes Give Assembly-Dependent Measurements","vocabulary_separation_audit":"This case uses medical-device manufacturing language centered on probes, molded housings, tissue reflectance, and production inspection; the transfer case uses live-event projection language."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E14A038__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Touring live-event projection mapping","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement contains no recommendation, intervention, or procedural remedy.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_pair_specific_arbitrary_placement_calibration_a01","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Venue-specific projector and tracking-camera positions, orientations, optics, color response, and timing make one shared show transform inaccurate across paired installations."}],"scenario_text":"A touring concert carries several identical projector and tracking-camera kits for graphics that must follow moving scenic panels. At each venue, local crews suspend a projector and its camera wherever the roof structure permits. Small differences in separation, angle, lens centering, color response, and video delay are unavoidable, and a projector is not always paired with the same camera used at the previous stop. The media server applies one coordinate, color, and timing transform prepared during rehearsals. In the field, an overlay that aligns on one rig lands several centimeters off on another; some pairs also show color seams or a visible lag during fast panel movement. Repeating a cue on the same installed pair produces consistent results, but copying the transform between rigs produces errors with different directions and magnitudes. Component self-tests remain normal, and no single tour-wide transform has kept every assembled projector–camera pair inside the show’s alignment and timing limits.","scenario_title":"Touring Projection Rigs Diverge Between Venues","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The scenario shifts from manufactured medical probes to temporary entertainment installations and uses distinct vocabulary involving trusses, scenic panels, media servers, overlays, and show cues."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E14A038__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Touring live-event projection mapping","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"ext001_pair_specific_arbitrary_placement_calibration_a01","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement identifies observations and the source of the reported anomaly without recommending any response.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_pair_specific_arbitrary_placement_calibration_a01","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"The rigs use repeatable keyed mounts and matched electronics, and testing explicitly confirms that one shared transform remains accurate across units and exchanged projector–camera pairings."}],"scenario_text":"A touring concert uses projector and tracking-camera kits for graphics that follow moving scenic panels. Although the equipment is repeatedly packed and installed, every venue receives the same surveyed truss frame with keyed mounts that fix camera and projector position and angle. The optics come from a tightly matched production run, and measured color response and video delay are effectively identical across units. Acceptance records from thirty rigs show that one shared coordinate, color, and timing transform stays within the show’s limits, including after projectors and cameras are exchanged between kits. Operators nevertheless report that several overlays jump to the wrong side of a panel during older songs. Logs show the physical tracking coordinates and rendered positions remain correct for every rig. The affected content packages alone declare a retired stage origin and invert one axis when loaded, while newly authored songs run normally on the same hardware. There is no observed assembly-dependent change in geometry, gain, or timing.","scenario_title":"Legacy Show Packages Misplace Otherwise Consistent Overlays","vocabulary_separation_audit":"This near miss deliberately retains the transfer domain and comparable technical detail while stating standardized mounting, matched hardware behavior, and successful interchangeability; it does not reuse the direct case’s medical-manufacturing vocabulary."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp14_applicability_retrieval40_20260813","sample_id":"E14A038","schema_version":1}