{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E14A040__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"hospital transfusion operations","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports dependencies, observed outages, and operational consequences without proposing changes or naming an intervention.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_failover_a01","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Every blood-unit release requires approval from the same verification service; no release can proceed when that service is unavailable."}],"scenario_text":"A regional hospital’s transfusion laboratory uses several analyzers, refrigerators, and order-entry terminals, but every blood unit must receive an electronic compatibility approval from the same verification service before staff may release it. The service runs on a dedicated appliance maintained by the laboratory vendor. Analyzer results and clinician orders can still be viewed when that appliance is unavailable, yet the issue desk cannot print a valid release label or record the required approval. Hospital policy prohibits completing this step on paper, and even urgent requests are held unless physicians invoke a separate uncrossmatched-blood protocol that is unsuitable for routine transfusions. During two brief appliance freezes last month, prepared units remained inside the laboratory while surgeries and oncology infusions waited. The laboratory processes enough simultaneous requests that interruption of routine release for even twenty minutes creates a growing queue across the hospital. Managers are reviewing why otherwise functioning equipment and staffed workstations cannot keep normal blood distribution operating whenever this one verification appliance stops responding.","scenario_title":"Blood Units Waiting in the Laboratory","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses clinical orders, compatibility approval, release labels, transfusion protocols, and laboratory equipment; the transfer case instead uses river works, irrigation flows, and farm water allocations."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E14A040__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"agricultural irrigation infrastructure","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes the current water-delivery geometry and consequences of blockage without suggesting construction, operational changes, or contingency measures.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_failover_a01","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"All essential irrigation water enters through one diversion tunnel, and obstruction there stops delivery to every downstream branch."}],"scenario_text":"An irrigation district supplies 4,800 hectares of orchards from a mountain river. Water enters the district through a century-old diversion tunnel cut beneath a ridge, then divides among three canals serving separate valleys. The downstream canals have their own gates and maintenance crews, but none reaches another river intake or reservoir. During the summer allocation period, the tunnel carries the entire flow needed to keep young trees alive through prolonged heat. Recent inspections found recurring rock fragments on its floor, and a small fall last season reduced flow for six hours while crews cleared debris. Even though all three valley canals remained intact, farms in every service area received less water because nothing could enter the network around the obstruction. A larger collapse, gate seizure, or heavy sediment plug at the tunnel entrance would halt district deliveries altogether until access was restored. Growers are concerned that the condition of this geographically isolated passage governs whether thousands of hectares receive their scheduled water during the most sensitive weeks of the season.","scenario_title":"Water Deliveries Through the Ridge","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses physical conveyance language—river intake, tunnel, canals, gates, sediment, and orchards—rather than the direct case’s hospital software, approvals, labels, and transfusion workflow."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E14A040__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"agricultural irrigation infrastructure","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"ext001_failover_a01","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement presents already-existing infrastructure and operating facts solely as diagnostic evidence; it does not recommend an intervention or describe a future remedy.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_failover_a01","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"Either of two independently sourced and controlled conveyances can carry the district’s essential allocation, and an outage on one leaves the other operating."}],"scenario_text":"A neighboring irrigation district also supplies several thousand hectares of orchards divided among three valleys, and its growers face the same summer heat and narrow watering windows. Its distribution network, however, receives water through two separately controlled conveyances: an eastern canal from the Cedar River and a western tunnel from Lake Harmon. Each enters the district at a different location and can carry the full minimum allocation required to keep young trees alive. The two sources do not share an intake, head gate, power feed, or upstream channel before joining the district’s looped distribution canals. Last season, a rockfall closed the western tunnel for nine hours. Operators recorded lower scheduling flexibility, but water from the eastern canal continued reaching all three valleys, and no farm lost its essential allotment. Earlier maintenance at the eastern head gate produced the reverse pattern, with the western tunnel carrying required flows. The district still faces sediment removal, aging gates, and disputes over peak-demand scheduling, but inspection records explicitly show that obstruction of either incoming conveyance alone does not stop essential water delivery.","scenario_title":"Two Sources Serving Three Valleys","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer case’s irrigation scale, seasonal pressure, physical hazards, and domain vocabulary while explicitly changing only the decisive dependency structure."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp14_applicability_retrieval40_20260813","sample_id":"E14A040","schema_version":1}